From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de, dzickus@redhat.com
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:17:46 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-4a31bebe71ab2e4f6ecd6e5f9f2ac9f0ff38ff76@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282228033.2605.204.camel@laptop>
Commit-ID: 4a31bebe71ab2e4f6ecd6e5f9f2ac9f0ff38ff76
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4a31bebe71ab2e4f6ecd6e5f9f2ac9f0ff38ff76
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:28:00 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:00:06 +0200
perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values
Now that we rely on the number of handled overflows, ensure all handle_irq
implementations actually return the right number.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <1282228033.2605.204.camel@laptop>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 9 +++++++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index d8d86d0..4539b4b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -713,6 +713,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
int bit, loops;
u64 ack, status;
+ int handled = 0;
perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0);
@@ -743,12 +744,16 @@ again:
/*
* PEBS overflow sets bit 62 in the global status register
*/
- if (__test_and_clear_bit(62, (unsigned long *)&status))
+ if (__test_and_clear_bit(62, (unsigned long *)&status)) {
+ handled++;
x86_pmu.drain_pebs(regs);
+ }
for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&status, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[bit];
+ handled++;
+
if (!test_bit(bit, cpuc->active_mask))
continue;
@@ -772,7 +777,7 @@ again:
done:
intel_pmu_enable_all(0);
- return 1;
+ return handled;
}
static struct event_constraint *
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
index febb12c..d470c91 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static int p4_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs);
}
- return handled > 0;
+ return handled;
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-20 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 9:21 A question of perf NMI handler Lin Ming
2010-08-04 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-04 10:01 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-04 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-04 10:29 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-04 14:00 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-04 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-04 14:52 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-04 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-04 15:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-04 15:50 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-04 16:10 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-04 16:20 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-04 16:39 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-04 18:48 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-04 19:22 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 19:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-06 6:52 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-06 14:21 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-09 19:48 ` [PATCH] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running perfctrs Robert Richter
2010-08-09 20:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-10 7:42 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-10 16:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-10 16:41 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-10 17:24 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-10 19:05 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-10 19:24 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-12 13:24 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-12 14:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-10 20:48 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-11 2:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-08-11 11:10 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-11 12:44 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-11 14:03 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-11 14:32 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-13 4:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-08-13 8:22 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-14 1:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-08-14 2:29 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-11 12:39 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-11 3:19 ` Huang Ying
2010-08-11 12:36 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-16 14:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-11 22:00 ` [PATCH -v2] " Robert Richter
2010-08-12 13:10 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-12 18:21 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-16 7:37 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-12 13:52 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-13 4:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-08-16 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 16:27 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-16 17:16 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-16 19:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-16 19:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 19:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-16 22:55 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-17 15:23 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-17 15:22 ` [PATCH -v3] " Robert Richter
2010-08-17 16:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-19 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 12:39 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-19 14:12 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-19 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 15:20 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-19 17:43 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-19 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 21:58 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-20 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 1:50 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-20 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-20 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 10:30 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-20 12:39 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-20 13:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-20 13:51 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-20 14:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-20 20:45 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-08-24 21:48 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-20 8:36 ` Robert Richter
2010-08-20 14:17 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-08-20 14:17 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Try to handle unknown nmis with an enabled PMU tip-bot for Robert Richter
2010-08-06 15:35 ` A question of perf NMI handler Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 15:45 ` Don Zickus
2010-08-06 15:37 ` Andi Kleen
2010-08-04 13:54 ` Don Zickus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-02 19:07 [PATCH 3/3] perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values Don Zickus
2010-09-03 7:10 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-4a31bebe71ab2e4f6ecd6e5f9f2ac9f0ff38ff76@git.kernel.org \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).