public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agordeev@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/io_apic: Move and reenable irq only when CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ=y
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:46:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-4da7072ad6831a35a11341097ce477e18651bedd@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120320141935.GA24806@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>

Commit-ID:  4da7072ad6831a35a11341097ce477e18651bedd
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/4da7072ad6831a35a11341097ce477e18651bedd
Author:     Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:19:36 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:47:25 +0100

x86/io_apic: Move and reenable irq only when CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ=y

This patch removes dead code from certain .config variations.

When CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ=n irq move and reenable code is
never get executed, nor do_unmask_irq variable updates its init
value. Move the code under CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ macro.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120320141935.GA24806@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |  101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index 6d10a66..2c428c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -2512,21 +2512,73 @@ static void ack_apic_edge(struct irq_data *data)
 
 atomic_t irq_mis_count;
 
-static void ack_apic_level(struct irq_data *data)
-{
-	struct irq_cfg *cfg = data->chip_data;
-	int i, do_unmask_irq = 0, irq = data->irq;
-	unsigned long v;
-
-	irq_complete_move(cfg);
 #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
+static inline bool ioapic_irqd_mask(struct irq_data *data, struct irq_cfg *cfg)
+{
 	/* If we are moving the irq we need to mask it */
 	if (unlikely(irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(data))) {
-		do_unmask_irq = 1;
 		mask_ioapic(cfg);
+		return true;
 	}
+	return false;
+}
+
+static inline void ioapic_irqd_unmask(struct irq_data *data,
+				      struct irq_cfg *cfg, bool masked)
+{
+	if (unlikely(masked)) {
+		/* Only migrate the irq if the ack has been received.
+		 *
+		 * On rare occasions the broadcast level triggered ack gets
+		 * delayed going to ioapics, and if we reprogram the
+		 * vector while Remote IRR is still set the irq will never
+		 * fire again.
+		 *
+		 * To prevent this scenario we read the Remote IRR bit
+		 * of the ioapic.  This has two effects.
+		 * - On any sane system the read of the ioapic will
+		 *   flush writes (and acks) going to the ioapic from
+		 *   this cpu.
+		 * - We get to see if the ACK has actually been delivered.
+		 *
+		 * Based on failed experiments of reprogramming the
+		 * ioapic entry from outside of irq context starting
+		 * with masking the ioapic entry and then polling until
+		 * Remote IRR was clear before reprogramming the
+		 * ioapic I don't trust the Remote IRR bit to be
+		 * completey accurate.
+		 *
+		 * However there appears to be no other way to plug
+		 * this race, so if the Remote IRR bit is not
+		 * accurate and is causing problems then it is a hardware bug
+		 * and you can go talk to the chipset vendor about it.
+		 */
+		if (!io_apic_level_ack_pending(cfg))
+			irq_move_masked_irq(data);
+		unmask_ioapic(cfg);
+	}
+}
+#else
+static inline bool ioapic_irqd_mask(struct irq_data *data, struct irq_cfg *cfg)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+static inline void ioapic_irqd_unmask(struct irq_data *data,
+				      struct irq_cfg *cfg, bool masked)
+{
+}
 #endif
 
+static void ack_apic_level(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct irq_cfg *cfg = data->chip_data;
+	int i, irq = data->irq;
+	unsigned long v;
+	bool masked;
+
+	irq_complete_move(cfg);
+	masked = ioapic_irqd_mask(data, cfg);
+
 	/*
 	 * It appears there is an erratum which affects at least version 0x11
 	 * of I/O APIC (that's the 82093AA and cores integrated into various
@@ -2581,38 +2633,7 @@ static void ack_apic_level(struct irq_data *data)
 		eoi_ioapic_irq(irq, cfg);
 	}
 
-	/* Now we can move and renable the irq */
-	if (unlikely(do_unmask_irq)) {
-		/* Only migrate the irq if the ack has been received.
-		 *
-		 * On rare occasions the broadcast level triggered ack gets
-		 * delayed going to ioapics, and if we reprogram the
-		 * vector while Remote IRR is still set the irq will never
-		 * fire again.
-		 *
-		 * To prevent this scenario we read the Remote IRR bit
-		 * of the ioapic.  This has two effects.
-		 * - On any sane system the read of the ioapic will
-		 *   flush writes (and acks) going to the ioapic from
-		 *   this cpu.
-		 * - We get to see if the ACK has actually been delivered.
-		 *
-		 * Based on failed experiments of reprogramming the
-		 * ioapic entry from outside of irq context starting
-		 * with masking the ioapic entry and then polling until
-		 * Remote IRR was clear before reprogramming the
-		 * ioapic I don't trust the Remote IRR bit to be
-		 * completey accurate.
-		 *
-		 * However there appears to be no other way to plug
-		 * this race, so if the Remote IRR bit is not
-		 * accurate and is causing problems then it is a hardware bug
-		 * and you can go talk to the chipset vendor about it.
-		 */
-		if (!io_apic_level_ack_pending(cfg))
-			irq_move_masked_irq(data);
-		unmask_ioapic(cfg);
-	}
+	ioapic_irqd_unmask(data, cfg, masked);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_REMAP

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-23 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-20 14:19 [PATCH V2] x86: io_apic: Move and reenable irq only when CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ=y Alexander Gordeev
2012-03-23 12:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-23 12:45   ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-03-23 12:46     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-23 19:46 ` tip-bot for Alexander Gordeev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-4da7072ad6831a35a11341097ce477e18651bedd@git.kernel.org \
    --to=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox