From: "tip-bot for Yan, Zheng" <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, zheng.z.yan@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Register the PMU only if the uncore pci device exists
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:00:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-513d793e5fe138d779ad6c532cd20c289a6897fc@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409872109-31645-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
Commit-ID: 513d793e5fe138d779ad6c532cd20c289a6897fc
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/513d793e5fe138d779ad6c532cd20c289a6897fc
Author: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:08:27 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:48:22 +0200
perf/x86/intel/uncore: Register the PMU only if the uncore pci device exists
Current code registers PMUs for all possible uncore pci devices.
This is not good because, on some machines, one or more uncore pci
devices can be missing. The missing pci device make corresponding
PMU unusable. Register the PMU only if the uncore device exists.
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: eranian@google.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409872109-31645-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index 2b0fa02..42d00e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
struct intel_uncore_box *box;
struct intel_uncore_type *type;
int phys_id;
+ bool first_box = false;
phys_id = uncore_pcibus_to_physid[pdev->bus->number];
if (phys_id < 0)
@@ -827,9 +828,13 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, box);
raw_spin_lock(&uncore_box_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&pmu->box_list))
+ first_box = true;
list_add_tail(&box->list, &pmu->box_list);
raw_spin_unlock(&uncore_box_lock);
+ if (first_box)
+ uncore_pmu_register(pmu);
return 0;
}
@@ -838,6 +843,7 @@ static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
struct intel_uncore_box *box = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu;
int i, cpu, phys_id = uncore_pcibus_to_physid[pdev->bus->number];
+ bool last_box = false;
box = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
if (!box) {
@@ -859,6 +865,8 @@ static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
raw_spin_lock(&uncore_box_lock);
list_del(&box->list);
+ if (list_empty(&pmu->box_list))
+ last_box = true;
raw_spin_unlock(&uncore_box_lock);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
@@ -870,6 +878,9 @@ static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&box->refcnt) != 1);
kfree(box);
+
+ if (last_box)
+ perf_pmu_unregister(&pmu->pmu);
}
static int __init uncore_pci_init(void)
@@ -1221,14 +1232,6 @@ static int __init uncore_pmus_register(void)
}
}
- for (i = 0; uncore_pci_uncores[i]; i++) {
- type = uncore_pci_uncores[i];
- for (j = 0; j < type->num_boxes; j++) {
- pmu = &type->pmus[j];
- uncore_pmu_register(pmu);
- }
- }
-
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-24 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-04 23:08 [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86, uncore: Fix section mismatch in split uncore driver Andi Kleen
2014-09-04 23:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86, uncore: Add Haswell-EP uncore support Andi Kleen
2014-09-24 15:00 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: " tip-bot for Yan, Zheng
2014-10-22 19:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86, uncore: " Alexei Starovoitov
2014-10-27 11:57 ` Andi Kleen
2014-09-04 23:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86, uncore: Register the PMU only if the uncore pci device exists Andi Kleen
2014-09-24 15:00 ` tip-bot for Yan, Zheng [this message]
2014-09-04 23:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86, uncore: Add missing cbox filter flags on IvyBridge-EP uncore driver Andi Kleen
2014-09-24 15:00 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2014-09-04 23:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86, uncore: Fix PCU filter setup for Sandy/Ivy/Haswell EP Andi Kleen
2014-09-24 15:00 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2014-09-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86, uncore: Fix section mismatch in split uncore driver Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-513d793e5fe138d779ad6c532cd20c289a6897fc@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox