From: tip-bot for Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, venki@google.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Clean up the IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING code
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:03:54 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-544b4a1f309d18f40969dbab7e08bafd136b2f55@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298675596-10992-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com>
Commit-ID: 544b4a1f309d18f40969dbab7e08bafd136b2f55
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/544b4a1f309d18f40969dbab7e08bafd136b2f55
Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:13:16 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:59:58 +0100
sched: Clean up the IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING code
Fix this warning:
lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/30/124
kernel/sched.c:3719: warning: 'irqtime_account_idle_ticks' defined but not used
kernel/sched.c:3720: warning: 'irqtime_account_process_tick' defined but not used
In a cleaner way than:
7e9498705e81: sched: Add #ifdef around irq time accounting functions
This patch will not have any functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
LKML-Reference: <1298675596-10992-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 79bca16..0c87126 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3687,7 +3687,36 @@ void account_system_time(struct task_struct *p, int hardirq_offset,
__account_system_time(p, cputime, cputime_scaled, target_cputime64);
}
+/*
+ * Account for involuntary wait time.
+ * @cputime: the cpu time spent in involuntary wait
+ */
+void account_steal_time(cputime_t cputime)
+{
+ struct cpu_usage_stat *cpustat = &kstat_this_cpu.cpustat;
+ cputime64_t cputime64 = cputime_to_cputime64(cputime);
+
+ cpustat->steal = cputime64_add(cpustat->steal, cputime64);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Account for idle time.
+ * @cputime: the cpu time spent in idle wait
+ */
+void account_idle_time(cputime_t cputime)
+{
+ struct cpu_usage_stat *cpustat = &kstat_this_cpu.cpustat;
+ cputime64_t cputime64 = cputime_to_cputime64(cputime);
+ struct rq *rq = this_rq();
+
+ if (atomic_read(&rq->nr_iowait) > 0)
+ cpustat->iowait = cputime64_add(cpustat->iowait, cputime64);
+ else
+ cpustat->idle = cputime64_add(cpustat->idle, cputime64);
+}
+
#ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
+
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
/*
* Account a tick to a process and cpustat
@@ -3749,42 +3778,11 @@ static void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks)
for (i = 0; i < ticks; i++)
irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, rq);
}
-#else
+#else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
static void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks) {}
static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
struct rq *rq) {}
-#endif
-#endif /* !CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING */
-
-/*
- * Account for involuntary wait time.
- * @steal: the cpu time spent in involuntary wait
- */
-void account_steal_time(cputime_t cputime)
-{
- struct cpu_usage_stat *cpustat = &kstat_this_cpu.cpustat;
- cputime64_t cputime64 = cputime_to_cputime64(cputime);
-
- cpustat->steal = cputime64_add(cpustat->steal, cputime64);
-}
-
-/*
- * Account for idle time.
- * @cputime: the cpu time spent in idle wait
- */
-void account_idle_time(cputime_t cputime)
-{
- struct cpu_usage_stat *cpustat = &kstat_this_cpu.cpustat;
- cputime64_t cputime64 = cputime_to_cputime64(cputime);
- struct rq *rq = this_rq();
-
- if (atomic_read(&rq->nr_iowait) > 0)
- cpustat->iowait = cputime64_add(cpustat->iowait, cputime64);
- else
- cpustat->idle = cputime64_add(cpustat->idle, cputime64);
-}
-
-#ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
+#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
/*
* Account a single tick of cpu time.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-26 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110225133228.GD7469@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
2011-02-25 14:43 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Add #ifdef around irq time accounting functions tip-bot for Heiko Carstens
2011-02-25 18:13 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2011-02-25 23:13 ` [PATCH] sched: Minor IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING code layout change Venkatesh Pallipadi
2011-02-26 7:03 ` tip-bot for Venkatesh Pallipadi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-544b4a1f309d18f40969dbab7e08bafd136b2f55@git.kernel.org \
--to=venki@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox