From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Further cleanups of use of lastcomp
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:18:55 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-560d4bc0df9a5e63b980432282d8c2bd3559ec74@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258170699933-git-send-email->
Commit-ID: 560d4bc0df9a5e63b980432282d8c2bd3559ec74
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/560d4bc0df9a5e63b980432282d8c2bd3559ec74
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:51:38 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:31:42 +0100
rcu: Further cleanups of use of lastcomp
Now that a copy of the rsp->completed flag is available in all
rcu_node structures, make full use of it. It is still
legitimate to access rsp->completed while holding the root
rcu_node structure's lock, however.
Also, tighten up force_quiescent_state()'s checks for end of
current grace period.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
LKML-Reference: <1258170699933-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 3df0438..24bbf2c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ cpu_quiet(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp, long lastcomp)
rnp = rdp->mynode;
spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- if (lastcomp != ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->completed)) {
+ if (lastcomp != rnp->completed) {
/*
* Someone beat us to it for this grace period, so leave.
@@ -935,7 +935,6 @@ static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp)
static void __rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
unsigned long flags;
- long lastcomp;
unsigned long mask;
struct rcu_data *rdp = rsp->rda[cpu];
struct rcu_node *rnp;
@@ -971,7 +970,6 @@ static void __rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
rnp = rnp->parent;
} while (rnp != NULL);
- lastcomp = rsp->completed;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
@@ -1145,7 +1143,7 @@ static int rcu_process_dyntick(struct rcu_state *rsp, long lastcomp,
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp) {
mask = 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- if (rsp->completed != lastcomp) {
+ if (rnp->completed != lastcomp) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return 1;
}
@@ -1159,7 +1157,7 @@ static int rcu_process_dyntick(struct rcu_state *rsp, long lastcomp,
if ((rnp->qsmask & bit) != 0 && f(rsp->rda[cpu]))
mask |= bit;
}
- if (mask != 0 && rsp->completed == lastcomp) {
+ if (mask != 0 && rnp->completed == lastcomp) {
/* cpu_quiet_msk() releases rnp->lock. */
cpu_quiet_msk(mask, rsp, rnp, flags);
@@ -1196,7 +1194,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
lastcomp = rsp->gpnum - 1;
signaled = rsp->signaled;
rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
- if (lastcomp == rsp->gpnum) {
+ if(!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
rsp->n_force_qs_ngp++;
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
goto unlock_ret; /* no GP in progress, time updated. */
@@ -1224,7 +1222,8 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
/* Update state, record completion counter. */
forcenow = 0;
spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
- if (lastcomp == rsp->completed &&
+ if (lastcomp + 1 == rsp->gpnum &&
+ lastcomp == rsp->completed &&
rsp->signaled == signaled) {
rsp->signaled = RCU_FORCE_QS;
rsp->completed_fqs = lastcomp;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-14 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-14 3:51 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/2] rcu: lastcomp cleanups, fix rcu_pending() false positives Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-14 3:51 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: further cleanups of use of lastcomp Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-14 10:18 ` tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-11-14 3:51 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/2] rcu: eliminate __rcu_pending() false positives Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-14 10:19 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Eliminate " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-560d4bc0df9a5e63b980432282d8c2bd3559ec74@git.kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox