From: tip-bot for Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, elendil@planet.nl,
sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com, subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Remove indirect variable usage at arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:30:46 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-5a8aee6c809dc36e42b256566e5e28e244be3c74@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090520062115.23889.45487.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
Commit-ID: 5a8aee6c809dc36e42b256566e5e28e244be3c74
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5a8aee6c809dc36e42b256566e5e28e244be3c74
Author: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:51:15 +0530
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:26:30 +0200
x86: Remove indirect variable usage at arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
The following warning is generated on compilation:
CC arch/x86/kernel/tsc.o
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c: In function 'time_cpufreq_notifier':
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c:634: warning: 'dummy' may be used uninitialized in this function
However, there seems to be no practical usage of variable 'dummy'
in the following piece of code:
630 static int time_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
631 void *data)
632 {
633 struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
634 unsigned long *lpj, dummy;
635
636 if (cpu_has(&cpu_data(freq->cpu), X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
637 return 0;
638
639 lpj = &dummy;
640 if (!(freq->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS))
641 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
642 lpj = &cpu_data(freq->cpu).loops_per_jiffy;
643 #else
644 lpj = &boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy;
645 #endif
646
'lpj' probably will get to point to some address after this if() statement.
647 if (!ref_freq) {
648 ref_freq = freq->old;
649 loops_per_jiffy_ref = *lpj;
And, if it does, then "loops_per_jiffy_ref" will have a proper value,
else, even with "lpj = &dummy" will not gurantee "loops_per_jiffy_ref = *lpj"
to have the expected value.
650 tsc_khz_ref = tsc_khz;
651 }
652 if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old < freq->new) ||
653 (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) ||
654 (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)) {
655 *lpj = cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freq->new);
656
657 tsc_khz = cpufreq_scale(tsc_khz_ref, ref_freq, freq->new);
658 if (!(freq->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS))
659 mark_tsc_unstable("cpufreq changes");
660 }
661
662 set_cyc2ns_scale(tsc_khz, freq->cpu);
663
664 return 0;
665 }
Also included fix expected by Frans Pop:
> No comments on your patch, but it might be good to also fix the incorrect
> indentation here: line 644 needs an extra tab.
Please refer:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/19/312, and,
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/19/301.
Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sachin P Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090520062115.23889.45487.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 7 +++----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 3e1c057..7714609 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -631,17 +631,16 @@ static int time_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
void *data)
{
struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
- unsigned long *lpj, dummy;
+ unsigned long *lpj = NULL;
if (cpu_has(&cpu_data(freq->cpu), X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
return 0;
- lpj = &dummy;
if (!(freq->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS))
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
lpj = &cpu_data(freq->cpu).loops_per_jiffy;
#else
- lpj = &boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy;
+ lpj = &boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy;
#endif
if (!ref_freq) {
@@ -652,7 +651,7 @@ static int time_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old < freq->new) ||
(val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new) ||
(val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE)) {
- *lpj = cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freq->new);
+ *lpj = cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freq->new);
tsc_khz = cpufreq_scale(tsc_khz_ref, ref_freq, freq->new);
if (!(freq->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS))
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-20 6:21 [PATCH][Resend] Remove indirect variable usage at arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c Subrata Modak
2009-06-17 15:30 ` tip-bot for Subrata Modak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-5a8aee6c809dc36e42b256566e5e28e244be3c74@git.kernel.org \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).