From: tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
andreas.herrmann3@amd.com, sp@numascale.com, bp@amd64.org,
stable@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, borislav.petkov@amd.com,
daniel@numascale-asia.com
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id()
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:53:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-68894632afb2729a1d8785c877840953894c7283@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120402160648.GR27684@alberich.amd.com>
Commit-ID: 68894632afb2729a1d8785c877840953894c7283
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/68894632afb2729a1d8785c877840953894c7283
Author: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:06:48 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:43:43 +0200
x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id()
It's only called from amd.c:srat_detect_node(). The introduced
condition for calling the fixup code is true for all AMD
multi-node processors, e.g. Magny-Cours and Interlagos. There we
have 2 NUMA nodes on one socket. Thus there are cores having
different numa-node-id but with equal phys_proc_id.
There is no point to print error messages in such a situation.
The confusing/misleading error message was introduced with
commit 64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda ("x86: Add
x86_init platform override to fix up NUMA core numbering").
Remove the default fixup function (especially the error message)
and replace it by a NULL pointer check, move the
Numascale-specific condition for calling the fixup into the
fixup-function itself and slightly adapt the comment.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: <sp@numascale.com>
Cc: <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120402160648.GR27684@alberich.amd.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h | 1 -
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c | 7 +++++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 7 ++++---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 9 ---------
arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c | 1 -
5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
index baaca8d..764b66a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
@@ -195,6 +195,5 @@ extern struct x86_msi_ops x86_msi;
extern void x86_init_noop(void);
extern void x86_init_uint_noop(unsigned int unused);
-extern void x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
index 899803e..23e7542 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
@@ -207,8 +207,11 @@ static void __init map_csrs(void)
static void fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
{
- c->phys_proc_id = node;
- per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node;
+
+ if (c->phys_proc_id != node) {
+ c->phys_proc_id = node;
+ per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node;
+ }
}
static int __init numachip_system_init(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index 1248f9c..1c67ca1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu);
/*
- * If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform,
- * so invoke platform-specific handler
+ * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a
+ * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some
+ * IDs of the CPU.
*/
- if (c->phys_proc_id != node)
+ if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id)
x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);
if (!node_online(node)) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 67e2583..cf79302 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1163,15 +1163,6 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void)
#endif /* ! CONFIG_KGDB */
/*
- * Prints an error where the NUMA and configured core-number mismatch and the
- * platform didn't override this to fix it up
- */
-void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
-{
- pr_err("NUMA core number %d differs from configured core number %d\n", node, c->phys_proc_id);
-}
-
-/*
* cpu_init() initializes state that is per-CPU. Some data is already
* initialized (naturally) in the bootstrap process, such as the GDT
* and IDT. We reload them nevertheless, this function acts as a
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
index e9f265f..9cf71d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
@@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ struct x86_init_ops x86_init __initdata = {
struct x86_cpuinit_ops x86_cpuinit __cpuinitdata = {
.early_percpu_clock_init = x86_init_noop,
.setup_percpu_clockev = setup_secondary_APIC_clock,
- .fixup_cpu_id = x86_default_fixup_cpu_id,
};
static void default_nmi_init(void) { };
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-16 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-20 17:17 [PATCH] x86: Remove wrong error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-21 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 11:05 ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-21 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 12:56 ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-22 13:47 ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-23 10:23 ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-24 15:31 ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-27 12:07 ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id() tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-28 15:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-28 16:42 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-03-02 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-02 11:51 ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-02 16:06 ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-04 12:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 17:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 18:53 ` tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-68894632afb2729a1d8785c877840953894c7283@git.kernel.org \
--to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=sp@numascale.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).