public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, menage@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, srostedt@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, miaox@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:tracing/ftrace] init,cpuset: fix initialize order
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:33:53 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-759ee0915dd713361e72facb78b66600b5712d65@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C9F416.1050707@cn.fujitsu.com>

Commit-ID:  759ee0915dd713361e72facb78b66600b5712d65
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/759ee0915dd713361e72facb78b66600b5712d65
Author:     Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:06:30 +0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:32:35 +0100

init,cpuset: fix initialize order

Impact: cpuset_wq should be initialized after init_workqueues()

When I read /debugfs/tracing/trace_stat/workqueues,
I got this:

 # CPU  INSERTED  EXECUTED   NAME
 # |      |         |          |

   0      0          0       cpuset
   0    285        285       events/0
   0      2          2       work_on_cpu/0
   0   1115       1115       khelper
   0    325        325       kblockd/0
   0      0          0       kacpid
   0      0          0       kacpi_notify
   0      0          0       ata/0
   0      0          0       ata_aux
   0      0          0       ksuspend_usbd
   0      0          0       aio/0
   0      0          0       nfsiod
   0      0          0       kpsmoused
   0      0          0       kstriped
   0      0          0       kondemand/0
   0      1          1       hid_compat
   0      0          0       rpciod/0

   1     64         64       events/1
   1      2          2       work_on_cpu/1
   1      5          5       kblockd/1
   1      0          0       ata/1
   1      0          0       aio/1
   1      0          0       kondemand/1
   1      0          0       rpciod/1

I found "cpuset" is at the earliest.

I found a create_singlethread_workqueue() is earlier than
init_workqueues():

kernel_init()
->cpuset_init_smp()
  ->create_singlethread_workqueue()
->do_basic_setup()
  ->init_workqueues()

I think it's better that create_singlethread_workqueue() is called
after workqueue subsystem has been initialized.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: miaoxie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <49C9F416.1050707@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>


---
 init/main.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
index 20d784a..b0097d2 100644
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -772,6 +772,7 @@ static void __init do_basic_setup(void)
 {
 	rcu_init_sched(); /* needed by module_init stage. */
 	init_workqueues();
+	cpuset_init_smp();
 	usermodehelper_init();
 	driver_init();
 	init_irq_proc();
@@ -865,8 +866,6 @@ static int __init kernel_init(void * unused)
 	smp_init();
 	sched_init_smp();
 
-	cpuset_init_smp();
-
 	do_basic_setup();
 
 	/*

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-25 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-25  9:06 [PATCH] init,cpuset: fix initialize order Lai Jiangshan
2009-03-25 13:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-03-25 14:00   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-03-25 17:33 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-759ee0915dd713361e72facb78b66600b5712d65@git.kernel.org \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox