From: tip-bot for Mike Galbraith <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: efault@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com,
umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched/autogroup: Fix 64-bit kernel nice level adjustment
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 22:24:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-83929cce95251cc77e5659bf493bd424ae0e7a67@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479897217.4306.6.camel@gmx.de>
Commit-ID: 83929cce95251cc77e5659bf493bd424ae0e7a67
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/83929cce95251cc77e5659bf493bd424ae0e7a67
Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:33:37 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 05:45:02 +0100
sched/autogroup: Fix 64-bit kernel nice level adjustment
Michael Kerrisk reported:
> Regarding the previous paragraph... My tests indicate
> that writing *any* value to the autogroup [nice priority level]
> file causes the task group to get a lower priority.
Because autogroup didn't call the then meaningless scale_load()...
Autogroup nice level adjustment has been broken ever since load
resolution was increased for 64-bit kernels. Use scale_load() to
scale group weight.
Michael Kerrisk tested this patch to fix the problem:
> Applied and tested against 4.9-rc6 on an Intel u7 (4 cores).
> Test setup:
>
> Terminal window 1: running 40 CPU burner jobs
> Terminal window 2: running 40 CPU burner jobs
> Terminal window 1: running 1 CPU burner job
>
> Demonstrated that:
> * Writing "0" to the autogroup file for TW1 now causes no change
> to the rate at which the process on the terminal consume CPU.
> * Writing -20 to the autogroup file for TW1 caused those processes
> to get the lion's share of CPU while TW2 TW3 get a tiny amount.
> * Writing -20 to the autogroup files for TW1 and TW3 allowed the
> process on TW3 to get as much CPU as it was getting as when
> the autogroup nice values for both terminals were 0.
Reported-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479897217.4306.6.camel@gmx.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/auto_group.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/auto_group.c b/kernel/sched/auto_group.c
index f1c8fd5..da39489 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/auto_group.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/auto_group.c
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ int proc_sched_autogroup_set_nice(struct task_struct *p, int nice)
{
static unsigned long next = INITIAL_JIFFIES;
struct autogroup *ag;
+ unsigned long shares;
int err;
if (nice < MIN_NICE || nice > MAX_NICE)
@@ -230,9 +231,10 @@ int proc_sched_autogroup_set_nice(struct task_struct *p, int nice)
next = HZ / 10 + jiffies;
ag = autogroup_task_get(p);
+ shares = scale_load(sched_prio_to_weight[nice + 20]);
down_write(&ag->lock);
- err = sched_group_set_shares(ag->tg, sched_prio_to_weight[nice + 20]);
+ err = sched_group_set_shares(ag->tg, shares);
if (!err)
ag->nice = nice;
up_write(&ag->lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-24 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-22 15:59 RFC: documentation of the autogroup feature Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-23 10:33 ` [patch] sched/autogroup: Fix 64bit kernel nice adjustment Mike Galbraith
2016-11-23 13:47 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-23 14:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-11-23 14:20 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-23 15:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-11-24 6:24 ` tip-bot for Mike Galbraith [this message]
2016-11-23 11:39 ` RFC: documentation of the autogroup feature Mike Galbraith
2016-11-23 13:54 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-23 15:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-11-23 16:04 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-23 17:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-11-24 21:41 ` RFC: documentation of the autogroup feature [v2] Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-25 12:52 ` Afzal Mohammed
2016-11-25 13:04 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-25 13:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-11-25 15:04 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-25 15:48 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-25 15:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-11-25 16:08 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-25 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-25 16:34 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-25 20:54 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-25 21:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 7:43 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-29 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 13:44 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-25 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-25 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-25 16:33 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-25 22:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-23 16:05 ` RFC: documentation of the autogroup feature Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-23 17:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-11-23 22:12 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-27 21:13 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-28 1:46 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <1127218a-dd9b-71a8-845d-3a83969632fc@gmail.com>
2016-11-29 9:10 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-11-29 13:46 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-83929cce95251cc77e5659bf493bd424ae0e7a67@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox