From: tip-bot for Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: [tip:x86/apic] x86, intr-remap: Avoid irq_chip mask/unmask in fixup_irqs() for intr-remapping
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:16:56 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-84e21493a3b28c9fefe99fe827fc0c0c101a813d@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091026230001.661423939@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Commit-ID: 84e21493a3b28c9fefe99fe827fc0c0c101a813d
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/84e21493a3b28c9fefe99fe827fc0c0c101a813d
Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:24:32 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:56:35 +0100
x86, intr-remap: Avoid irq_chip mask/unmask in fixup_irqs() for intr-remapping
In the presence of interrupt-remapping, irqs will be migrated in
the process context and we don't do (and there is no need to)
irq_chip mask/unmask while migrating the interrupt.
Similarly fix the fixup_irqs() that get called during cpu
offline and avoid calling irq_chip mask/unmask for irqs that are
ok to be migrated in the process context.
While we didn't observe any race condition with the existing
code, this change takes complete advantage of
interrupt-remapping in the newer generation platforms and avoids
any potential HW lockup's (that often worry Eric :)
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: garyhade@us.ibm.com
LKML-Reference: <20091026230001.661423939@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 3ea6655..342bcbc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
affinity = cpu_all_mask;
}
- if (desc->chip->mask)
+ if (!(desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT) && desc->chip->mask)
desc->chip->mask(irq);
if (desc->chip->set_affinity)
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
else if (!(warned++))
set_affinity = 0;
- if (desc->chip->unmask)
+ if (!(desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT) && desc->chip->unmask)
desc->chip->unmask(irq);
spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-02 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-26 22:24 [patch 0/6] x86: cleanups and fixes for irq migration code during cpu offline Suresh Siddha
2009-10-26 22:24 ` [patch 1/6] x86: unify fixup_irqs() for 32-bit and 64-bit kernels Suresh Siddha
2009-11-02 16:16 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Unify " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2009-10-26 22:24 ` [patch 2/6] x86, intr-remap: Avoid irq_chip mask/unmask in fixup_irqs() for intr-remapping Suresh Siddha
2009-11-02 16:16 ` tip-bot for Suresh Siddha [this message]
2009-10-26 22:24 ` [patch 3/6] x86: remove move_cleanup_count from irq_cfg Suresh Siddha
2009-11-02 16:17 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Remove " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2009-10-26 22:24 ` [patch 4/6] x86: force irq complete move during cpu offline Suresh Siddha
2009-11-02 16:17 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Force " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2009-10-26 22:24 ` [RFC patch 5/6] x86: Use EOI register in io-apic on intel platforms Suresh Siddha
2009-11-02 16:17 ` [tip:x86/apic] " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2009-11-04 0:53 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2009-11-04 2:24 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-11-04 23:04 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-11-05 14:46 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2009-11-06 0:01 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-11-06 6:53 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2009-11-07 7:27 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-11-08 19:06 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2009-12-02 0:56 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-26 22:24 ` [RFC patch 6/6] x86: remove local_irq_enable()/local_irq_disable() in fixup_irqs() Suresh Siddha
2009-11-02 16:17 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Remove " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2009-10-30 19:25 ` [patch 0/6] x86: cleanups and fixes for irq migration code during cpu offline Suresh Siddha
2009-11-02 14:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 17:35 ` Gary Hade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-84e21493a3b28c9fefe99fe827fc0c0c101a813d@git.kernel.org \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox