From: tip-bot for Michal Hocko <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
jkosina@suse.cz, mhocko@suse.com, oleg@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, davej@codemonkey.org.uk,
peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mmap, ASLR: Do not treat unlimited-stack tasks as legacy mmap
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 07:02:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-86b110d2ae6365ce91cabd37588bc8611770421a@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170614082218.12450-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
Commit-ID: 86b110d2ae6365ce91cabd37588bc8611770421a
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/86b110d2ae6365ce91cabd37588bc8611770421a
Author: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:22:18 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:02:01 +0200
x86/mmap, ASLR: Do not treat unlimited-stack tasks as legacy mmap
Since the following commit in 2008:
cc503c1b43e0 ("x86: PIE executable randomization")
We added a heuristics to treat applications with RLIMIT_STACK configured
to unlimited as legacy. This means:
a) set the mmap_base to 1/3 of address space + randomization and
b) mmap from bottom to top.
This makes some sense as it allows the stack to grow really large. On the
other hand it reduces the address space usable for default mmaps
(without address hint) quite a lot.
We have received a bug report that SAP HANA workload has hit into this
limitation.
We could argue that the user just got what he asked for when setting
up the unlimited stack but to be realistic growing stack up to 1/6
TASK_SIZE (allowed by mmap_base) is pretty much unimited in the real
life. This would give mmap 20TB of additional address space which is
quite nice. Especially when it is much more likely to use that address
space than the reserved stack.
Digging into the history the original implementation of the randomization:
8817210d4d96 ("[PATCH] x86_64: Flexmap for 32bit and randomized mappings for 64bit")
didn't have this restriction.
So let's try and remove this assumption - hopefully nothing breaks.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: hughd@google.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170614082218.12450-1-mhocko@kernel.org
[ So I've applied this to tip:x86/mm with a wider Cc: list - if anyone objects to this change please holler. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/mmap.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
index 19ad095..797295e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
@@ -74,9 +74,6 @@ static int mmap_is_legacy(void)
if (current->personality & ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT)
return 1;
- if (rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK) == RLIM_INFINITY)
- return 1;
-
return sysctl_legacy_va_layout;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-23 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-14 8:22 [RFC PATCH] mmap, aslr: do not enforce legacy mmap on unlimited stacks Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 8:46 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 14:02 ` tip-bot for Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-06-23 14:54 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86/mmap, ASLR: Do not treat unlimited-stack tasks as legacy mmap Oleg Nesterov
2017-06-27 8:00 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-06-27 14:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-06-28 9:40 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-06-23 20:35 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-06-24 6:43 ` tip-bot for Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-86b110d2ae6365ce91cabd37588bc8611770421a@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox