public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Peter Xu <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
	lcapitulino@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com
Subject: [tip:timers/core] timer: Document TIMER_PINNED
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 01:01:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-876d00da42ecd4e985e58faa6239f7ee7e01a8b1@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628105942.14131-1-peterx@redhat.com>

Commit-ID:  876d00da42ecd4e985e58faa6239f7ee7e01a8b1
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/876d00da42ecd4e985e58faa6239f7ee7e01a8b1
Author:     Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:59:42 +0800
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 09:57:36 +0200

timer: Document TIMER_PINNED

The flag hints the user that the pinned timers will always be run on a
static CPU (because that should be what "pinned" means...) but that's
not the truth, at least with the current implementation.

For example, currently if a pinned timer is set up but later mod_timer()
upon the pinned timer is invoked, mod_timer() will still try to queue the
timer on the current processor and migrate the timer if necessary.

Document it a bit with the definition of TIMER_PINNED so that all future
users will use it correctly.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190628105942.14131-1-peterx@redhat.com

---
 include/linux/timer.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/timer.h b/include/linux/timer.h
index 7b066fd38248..282e4f2a532a 100644
--- a/include/linux/timer.h
+++ b/include/linux/timer.h
@@ -36,19 +36,30 @@ struct timer_list {
 #define __TIMER_LOCKDEP_MAP_INITIALIZER(_kn)
 #endif
 
-/*
- * A deferrable timer will work normally when the system is busy, but
- * will not cause a CPU to come out of idle just to service it; instead,
- * the timer will be serviced when the CPU eventually wakes up with a
- * subsequent non-deferrable timer.
+/**
+ * @TIMER_DEFERRABLE: A deferrable timer will work normally when the
+ * system is busy, but will not cause a CPU to come out of idle just
+ * to service it; instead, the timer will be serviced when the CPU
+ * eventually wakes up with a subsequent non-deferrable timer.
  *
- * An irqsafe timer is executed with IRQ disabled and it's safe to wait for
- * the completion of the running instance from IRQ handlers, for example,
- * by calling del_timer_sync().
+ * @TIMER_IRQSAFE: An irqsafe timer is executed with IRQ disabled and
+ * it's safe to wait for the completion of the running instance from
+ * IRQ handlers, for example, by calling del_timer_sync().
  *
  * Note: The irq disabled callback execution is a special case for
  * workqueue locking issues. It's not meant for executing random crap
  * with interrupts disabled. Abuse is monitored!
+ *
+ * @TIMER_PINNED: A pinned timer will not be affected by any timer
+ * placement heuristics (like, NOHZ) and will always expire on the CPU
+ * on which the timer was enqueued.
+ *
+ * Note: Because enqueuing of timers can migrate the timer from one
+ * CPU to another, pinned timers are not guaranteed to stay on the
+ * initialy selected CPU.  They move to the CPU on which the enqueue
+ * function is invoked via mod_timer() or add_timer().  If the timer
+ * should be placed on a particular CPU, then add_timer_on() has to be
+ * used.
  */
 #define TIMER_CPUMASK		0x0003FFFF
 #define TIMER_MIGRATING		0x00040000

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-06  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-28 10:59 [PATCH v3] timer: Document TIMER_PINNED Peter Xu
2019-07-03 20:16 ` [tip:timers/core] " tip-bot for Peter Xu
2019-07-06  8:01 ` tip-bot for Peter Xu [this message]
2019-07-07  9:55 ` tip-bot for Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-876d00da42ecd4e985e58faa6239f7ee7e01a8b1@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox