public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Filippo Sironi <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sironi@amazon.de, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/microcode: Update the new microcode revision unconditionally
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 05:16:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-8da38ebaad23fe1b0c4a205438676f6356607cfc@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533050970-14385-1-git-send-email-sironi@amazon.de>

Commit-ID:  8da38ebaad23fe1b0c4a205438676f6356607cfc
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/8da38ebaad23fe1b0c4a205438676f6356607cfc
Author:     Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 17:29:30 +0200
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 14:10:54 +0200

x86/microcode: Update the new microcode revision unconditionally

Handle the case where microcode gets loaded on the BSP's hyperthread
sibling first and the boot_cpu_data's microcode revision doesn't get
updated because of early exit due to the siblings sharing a microcode
engine.

For that, simply write the updated revision on all CPUs unconditionally.

Signed-off-by: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: prarit@redhat.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1533050970-14385-1-git-send-email-sironi@amazon.de
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c   | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
index 602f17134103..07b5fc00b188 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -504,6 +504,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
 	struct microcode_amd *mc_amd;
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
 	struct ucode_patch *p;
+	enum ucode_state ret;
 	u32 rev, dummy;
 
 	BUG_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu);
@@ -521,9 +522,8 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
 
 	/* need to apply patch? */
 	if (rev >= mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) {
-		c->microcode = rev;
-		uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
-		return UCODE_OK;
+		ret = UCODE_OK;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd)) {
@@ -531,17 +531,21 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
 			cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
 		return UCODE_ERROR;
 	}
-	pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu,
-		mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
 
-	uci->cpu_sig.rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
-	c->microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
+	rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
+	ret = UCODE_UPDATED;
+
+	pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, rev);
+
+out:
+	uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+	c->microcode	 = rev;
 
 	/* Update boot_cpu_data's revision too, if we're on the BSP: */
 	if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index)
-		boot_cpu_data.microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
+		boot_cpu_data.microcode = rev;
 
-	return UCODE_UPDATED;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 256d336cbc04..16936a24795c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -795,6 +795,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
 	struct microcode_intel *mc;
+	enum ucode_state ret;
 	static int prev_rev;
 	u32 rev;
 
@@ -817,9 +818,8 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
 	 */
 	rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
 	if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
-		uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
-		c->microcode = rev;
-		return UCODE_OK;
+		ret = UCODE_OK;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -848,14 +848,17 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
 		prev_rev = rev;
 	}
 
+	ret = UCODE_UPDATED;
+
+out:
 	uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
-	c->microcode = rev;
+	c->microcode	 = rev;
 
 	/* Update boot_cpu_data's revision too, if we're on the BSP: */
 	if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index)
 		boot_cpu_data.microcode = rev;
 
-	return UCODE_UPDATED;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-02 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-31 15:29 [PATCH] x86/microcode: Don't duplicate code to update ucode cpu info and cpu info Filippo Sironi
2018-07-31 15:41 ` Greg KH
2018-07-31 16:23   ` Sironi, Filippo
2018-07-31 17:50     ` Greg KH
2018-09-02 12:16 ` tip-bot for Filippo Sironi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-8da38ebaad23fe1b0c4a205438676f6356607cfc@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sironi@amazon.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox