Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix transaction recovery in group_sched_in()

Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-15T17:40:03Z

On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 19:34 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> > Yes, makes sense.. I'm a bit hesitant to slap a -stable tag on it due to
> > its size,.. Ingo, Paulus?
> >
> I was worried about the size too but I could not figure out another
> smaller way of doing this. An alternative would be to pass an
> extra argument to the function and call it twice.

I think the current approach is fine, just being paranoid about
unintentional breakage..

I guess we should cook it a while before offering it to -stable.