public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Ralph Campbell <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rcampbell@nvidia.com, linux@eikelenboom.it,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, mchehab@s-opensource.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hans.verkuil@cisco.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, craigb@google.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, sean@mess.org,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Don't exceed the valid physical address space
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 06:16:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-92c77f7c4d5dfaaf45b2ce19360e69977c264766@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326001817.15413-2-rcampbell@nvidia.com>

Commit-ID:  92c77f7c4d5dfaaf45b2ce19360e69977c264766
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/92c77f7c4d5dfaaf45b2ce19360e69977c264766
Author:     Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:18:17 -0700
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:13:51 +0100

x86/mm: Don't exceed the valid physical address space

valid_phys_addr_range() is used to sanity check the physical address range
of an operation, e.g., access to /dev/mem. It uses __pa(high_memory)
internally.

If memory is populated at the end of the physical address space, then
__pa(high_memory) is outside of the physical address space because:

   high_memory = (void *)__va(max_pfn * PAGE_SIZE - 1) + 1;

For the comparison in valid_phys_addr_range() this is not an issue, but if
CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is enabled, __pa() maps to __phys_addr(), which
verifies that the resulting physical address is within the valid physical
address space of the CPU. So in the case that memory is populated at the
end of the physical address space, this is not true and triggers a
VIRTUAL_BUG_ON().

Use __pa(high_memory - 1) to prevent the conversion from going beyond
the end of valid physical addresses.

Fixes: be62a3204406 ("x86/mm: Limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses")
Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Craig Bergstrom <craigb@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190326001817.15413-2-rcampbell@nvidia.com

---
 arch/x86/mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
index db3165714521..dc726e07d8ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ bool mmap_address_hint_valid(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len)
 /* Can we access it for direct reading/writing? Must be RAM: */
 int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t count)
 {
-	return addr + count <= __pa(high_memory);
+	return addr + count - 1 <= __pa(high_memory - 1);
 }
 
 /* Can we access it through mmap? Must be a valid physical address: */

      reply	other threads:[~2019-03-28 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-26  0:18 [PATCH v2 0/1] x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical rcampbell
2019-03-26  0:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/mm: Fix limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses rcampbell
2019-03-28 13:16   ` tip-bot for Ralph Campbell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-92c77f7c4d5dfaaf45b2ce19360e69977c264766@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=craigb@google.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
    --cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sean@mess.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox