public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: acme@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jolsa@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix scaling vs. perf_install_in_context()
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:07:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-a096309bc4677f60caa8e93fcc613a55073c51d4@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160224174948.279399438@infradead.org>

Commit-ID:  a096309bc4677f60caa8e93fcc613a55073c51d4
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/a096309bc4677f60caa8e93fcc613a55073c51d4
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:45:50 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:44:29 +0100

perf: Fix scaling vs. perf_install_in_context()

Completely reworks perf_install_in_context() (again!) in order to
ensure that there will be no ctx time hole between add_event_to_ctx()
and any potential ctx_sched_in().

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dvyukov@google.com
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: panand@redhat.com
Cc: sasha.levin@oracle.com
Cc: vince@deater.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160224174948.279399438@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 57c25fa..25edabd 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -276,10 +276,10 @@ static void event_function_call(struct perf_event *event, event_f func, void *da
 		return;
 	}
 
-again:
 	if (task == TASK_TOMBSTONE)
 		return;
 
+again:
 	if (!task_function_call(task, event_function, &efs))
 		return;
 
@@ -289,13 +289,15 @@ again:
 	 * a concurrent perf_event_context_sched_out().
 	 */
 	task = ctx->task;
-	if (task != TASK_TOMBSTONE) {
-		if (ctx->is_active) {
-			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
-			goto again;
-		}
-		func(event, NULL, ctx, data);
+	if (task == TASK_TOMBSTONE) {
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (ctx->is_active) {
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+		goto again;
 	}
+	func(event, NULL, ctx, data);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
 }
 
@@ -2116,49 +2118,68 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
 /*
  * Cross CPU call to install and enable a performance event
  *
- * Must be called with ctx->mutex held
+ * Very similar to remote_function() + event_function() but cannot assume that
+ * things like ctx->is_active and cpuctx->task_ctx are set.
  */
 static int  __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
 {
-	struct perf_event_context *ctx = info;
+	struct perf_event *event = info;
+	struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
 	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
 	struct perf_event_context *task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
+	bool activate = true;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
 	if (ctx->task) {
 		raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
-		/*
-		 * If we hit the 'wrong' task, we've since scheduled and
-		 * everything should be sorted, nothing to do!
-		 */
 		task_ctx = ctx;
-		if (ctx->task != current)
+
+		/* If we're on the wrong CPU, try again */
+		if (task_cpu(ctx->task) != smp_processor_id()) {
+			ret = -ESRCH;
 			goto unlock;
+		}
 
 		/*
-		 * If task_ctx is set, it had better be to us.
+		 * If we're on the right CPU, see if the task we target is
+		 * current, if not we don't have to activate the ctx, a future
+		 * context switch will do that for us.
 		 */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx && cpuctx->task_ctx);
+		if (ctx->task != current)
+			activate = false;
+		else
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->task_ctx && cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx);
+
 	} else if (task_ctx) {
 		raw_spin_lock(&task_ctx->lock);
 	}
 
-	ctx_resched(cpuctx, task_ctx);
+	if (activate) {
+		ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME);
+		add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
+		ctx_resched(cpuctx, task_ctx);
+	} else {
+		add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
+	}
+
 unlock:
 	perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, task_ctx);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
- * Attach a performance event to a context
+ * Attach a performance event to a context.
+ *
+ * Very similar to event_function_call, see comment there.
  */
 static void
 perf_install_in_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 			struct perf_event *event,
 			int cpu)
 {
-	struct task_struct *task = NULL;
+	struct task_struct *task = READ_ONCE(ctx->task);
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
 
@@ -2166,42 +2187,46 @@ perf_install_in_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 	if (event->cpu != -1)
 		event->cpu = cpu;
 
+	if (!task) {
+		cpu_function_call(cpu, __perf_install_in_context, event);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Should not happen, we validate the ctx is still alive before calling.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(task == TASK_TOMBSTONE))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * Installing events is tricky because we cannot rely on ctx->is_active
 	 * to be set in case this is the nr_events 0 -> 1 transition.
-	 *
-	 * So what we do is we add the event to the list here, which will allow
-	 * a future context switch to DTRT and then send a racy IPI. If the IPI
-	 * fails to hit the right task, this means a context switch must have
-	 * happened and that will have taken care of business.
 	 */
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
-	task = ctx->task;
-
+again:
 	/*
-	 * If between ctx = find_get_context() and mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex) the
-	 * ctx gets destroyed, we must not install an event into it.
-	 *
-	 * This is normally tested for after we acquire the mutex, so this is
-	 * a sanity check.
+	 * Cannot use task_function_call() because we need to run on the task's
+	 * CPU regardless of whether its current or not.
 	 */
+	if (!cpu_function_call(task_cpu(task), __perf_install_in_context, event))
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+	task = ctx->task;
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(task == TASK_TOMBSTONE)) {
+		/*
+		 * Cannot happen because we already checked above (which also
+		 * cannot happen), and we hold ctx->mutex, which serializes us
+		 * against perf_event_exit_task_context().
+		 */
 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
 		return;
 	}
-
-	if (ctx->is_active) {
-		update_context_time(ctx);
-		update_cgrp_time_from_event(event);
-	}
-
-	add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
-
-	if (task)
-		task_function_call(task, __perf_install_in_context, ctx);
-	else
-		cpu_function_call(cpu, __perf_install_in_context, ctx);
+	/*
+	 * Since !ctx->is_active doesn't mean anything, we must IPI
+	 * unconditionally.
+	 */
+	goto again;
 }
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-25  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-24 17:45 [PATCH 00/12] perf: more fixes Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf: Close install vs exit race Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:03   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Close install vs. " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf: Do not double free Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:04   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf: Allow perf_release() with !event->ctx Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:04   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf: Only update context time when active Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:04   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf: Fix cloning Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:05   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf: Fix race between event install and jump_labels Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:05   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf: Cure event->pending_disable race Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:06   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf: Introduce EVENT_TIME Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:06   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix ctx time tracking by introducing EVENT_TIME tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf: Fix scaling vs enable_on_exec Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:07   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix scaling vs. perf_event_enable_on_exec() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf: Fix scaling vs perf_event_enable Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:07   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix scaling vs. perf_event_enable() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf: Fix scaling vs perf_install_in_context Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:07   ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-02-24 17:45 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf: Robustify task_function_call() Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  8:08   ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-10 14:39 ` [PATCH 00/12] perf: more fixes Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-10 14:44   ` Vince Weaver
2016-03-11 14:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-11 15:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-21  9:49       ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/ibs: Fix IBS throttle tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-15 15:38     ` [PATCH 00/12] perf: more fixes Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 22:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-16 23:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-17 11:54         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 10:12   ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-03-21  9:48   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: Fix the unthrottle logic tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-a096309bc4677f60caa8e93fcc613a55073c51d4@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox