public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Namhyung Kim <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, acme@redhat.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	jolsa@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior (again)
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 11:47:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-a1c9f97f0b64e6337d9cfcc08c134450934fdd90@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118051457.30946-2-namhyung@kernel.org>

Commit-ID:  a1c9f97f0b64e6337d9cfcc08c134450934fdd90
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/a1c9f97f0b64e6337d9cfcc08c134450934fdd90
Author:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:14:57 +0900
Committer:  Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:39:09 -0300

perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior (again)

Commit 21e6d8428664 ("perf diff: Use perf_hpp__register_sort_field
interface") changed list_add() to perf_hpp__register_sort_field().

This resulted in a behavior change since the field was added to the tail
instead of the head.  So the -o option is mostly ignored due to its
order in the list.

This patch fixes it by adding perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field().

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Fixes: 21e6d8428664 ("perf diff: Use perf_hpp__register_sort_field interface")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118051457.30946-2-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 2 +-
 tools/perf/ui/hist.c      | 6 ++++++
 tools/perf/util/hist.h    | 7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
index 9ff0db4..933aeec 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static int ui_init(void)
 		BUG_ON(1);
 	}
 
-	perf_hpp__register_sort_field(fmt);
+	perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field(fmt);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
index 4ec79b2..18cfcdc9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
@@ -521,6 +521,12 @@ void perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
 	list_add_tail(&format->sort_list, &list->sorts);
 }
 
+void perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
+				       struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
+{
+	list_add(&format->sort_list, &list->sorts);
+}
+
 void perf_hpp__column_unregister(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
 {
 	list_del(&format->list);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.h b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
index d4b6514..28c216e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
@@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ void perf_hpp_list__column_register(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
 				    struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
 void perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
 					struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
+void perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
+				       struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
 
 static inline void perf_hpp__column_register(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
 {
@@ -294,6 +296,11 @@ static inline void perf_hpp__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
 	perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(&perf_hpp_list, format);
 }
 
+static inline void perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
+{
+	perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(&perf_hpp_list, format);
+}
+
 #define perf_hpp_list__for_each_format(_list, format) \
 	list_for_each_entry(format, &(_list)->fields, list)
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-03 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18  5:14 [PATCH 1/2] perf diff: Fix segfault on perf diff -o N option Namhyung Kim
2017-01-18  5:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior (again) Namhyung Kim
2017-01-18 18:26   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-02-03 19:47   ` tip-bot for Namhyung Kim [this message]
2017-01-18 18:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf diff: Fix segfault on perf diff -o N option Jiri Olsa
2017-02-02  2:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-02-02 14:34   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-02-03 19:46 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf diff: Fix segfault on 'perf diff -o N' option tip-bot for Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-a1c9f97f0b64e6337d9cfcc08c134450934fdd90@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox