From: tip-bot for Namhyung Kim <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, acme@redhat.com,
mingo@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
jolsa@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior (again)
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 11:47:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-a1c9f97f0b64e6337d9cfcc08c134450934fdd90@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118051457.30946-2-namhyung@kernel.org>
Commit-ID: a1c9f97f0b64e6337d9cfcc08c134450934fdd90
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a1c9f97f0b64e6337d9cfcc08c134450934fdd90
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:14:57 +0900
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:39:09 -0300
perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior (again)
Commit 21e6d8428664 ("perf diff: Use perf_hpp__register_sort_field
interface") changed list_add() to perf_hpp__register_sort_field().
This resulted in a behavior change since the field was added to the tail
instead of the head. So the -o option is mostly ignored due to its
order in the list.
This patch fixes it by adding perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field().
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Fixes: 21e6d8428664 ("perf diff: Use perf_hpp__register_sort_field interface")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118051457.30946-2-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/ui/hist.c | 6 ++++++
tools/perf/util/hist.h | 7 +++++++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
index 9ff0db4..933aeec 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static int ui_init(void)
BUG_ON(1);
}
- perf_hpp__register_sort_field(fmt);
+ perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field(fmt);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
index 4ec79b2..18cfcdc9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
@@ -521,6 +521,12 @@ void perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
list_add_tail(&format->sort_list, &list->sorts);
}
+void perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
+ struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
+{
+ list_add(&format->sort_list, &list->sorts);
+}
+
void perf_hpp__column_unregister(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
{
list_del(&format->list);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.h b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
index d4b6514..28c216e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
@@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ void perf_hpp_list__column_register(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
void perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
+void perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
+ struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
static inline void perf_hpp__column_register(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
{
@@ -294,6 +296,11 @@ static inline void perf_hpp__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(&perf_hpp_list, format);
}
+static inline void perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
+{
+ perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(&perf_hpp_list, format);
+}
+
#define perf_hpp_list__for_each_format(_list, format) \
list_for_each_entry(format, &(_list)->fields, list)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-03 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 5:14 [PATCH 1/2] perf diff: Fix segfault on perf diff -o N option Namhyung Kim
2017-01-18 5:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior (again) Namhyung Kim
2017-01-18 18:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-02-03 19:47 ` tip-bot for Namhyung Kim [this message]
2017-01-18 18:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf diff: Fix segfault on perf diff -o N option Jiri Olsa
2017-02-02 2:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-02-02 14:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-02-03 19:46 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf diff: Fix segfault on 'perf diff -o N' option tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-a1c9f97f0b64e6337d9cfcc08c134450934fdd90@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox