From: tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: brgerst@gmail.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, luto@amacapital.net, hpa@zytor.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, dvlasenk@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] selftests/x86: In syscall_nt, test NT|TF as well
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 03:00:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-a318beea224d255c38652f88a7ae0d30ac4c23c3@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd4bb48af6b10c0dc84aec6dbcf487ed25683495.1457578375.git.luto@kernel.org>
Commit-ID: a318beea224d255c38652f88a7ae0d30ac4c23c3
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a318beea224d255c38652f88a7ae0d30ac4c23c3
Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 19:00:24 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:48:12 +0100
selftests/x86: In syscall_nt, test NT|TF as well
Setting TF prevents fastpath returns in most cases, which causes the
test to fail on 32-bit kernels because 32-bit kernels do not, in
fact, handle NT correctly on SYSENTER entries.
The next patch will fix 32-bit kernels.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bd4bb48af6b10c0dc84aec6dbcf487ed25683495.1457578375.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_nt.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_nt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_nt.c
index 60c06af4..43fcab36 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_nt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_nt.c
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <err.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <asm/processor-flags.h>
@@ -26,6 +29,8 @@
# define WIDTH "l"
#endif
+static unsigned int nerrs;
+
static unsigned long get_eflags(void)
{
unsigned long eflags;
@@ -39,16 +44,52 @@ static void set_eflags(unsigned long eflags)
: : "rm" (eflags) : "flags");
}
-int main()
+static void sethandler(int sig, void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *),
+ int flags)
{
- printf("[RUN]\tSet NT and issue a syscall\n");
- set_eflags(get_eflags() | X86_EFLAGS_NT);
+ struct sigaction sa;
+ memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
+ sa.sa_sigaction = handler;
+ sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO | flags;
+ sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
+ if (sigaction(sig, &sa, 0))
+ err(1, "sigaction");
+}
+
+static void sigtrap(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ctx_void)
+{
+}
+
+static void do_it(unsigned long extraflags)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ set_eflags(get_eflags() | extraflags);
syscall(SYS_getpid);
- if (get_eflags() & X86_EFLAGS_NT) {
- printf("[OK]\tThe syscall worked and NT is still set\n");
- return 0;
+ flags = get_eflags();
+ if ((flags & extraflags) == extraflags) {
+ printf("[OK]\tThe syscall worked and flags are still set\n");
} else {
- printf("[FAIL]\tThe syscall worked but NT was cleared\n");
- return 1;
+ printf("[FAIL]\tThe syscall worked but flags were cleared (flags = 0x%lx but expected 0x%lx set)\n",
+ flags, extraflags);
+ nerrs++;
}
}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ printf("[RUN]\tSet NT and issue a syscall\n");
+ do_it(X86_EFLAGS_NT);
+
+ /*
+ * Now try it again with TF set -- TF forces returns via IRET in all
+ * cases except non-ptregs-using 64-bit full fast path syscalls.
+ */
+
+ sethandler(SIGTRAP, sigtrap, 0);
+
+ printf("[RUN]\tSet NT|TF and issue a syscall\n");
+ do_it(X86_EFLAGS_NT | X86_EFLAGS_TF);
+
+ return nerrs == 0 ? 0 : 1;
+}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-10 3:00 [PATCH v2 00/12] x86: Various SYSENTER/SYSEXIT/#DB fixes and cleanups Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] selftests/x86: In syscall_nt, test NT|TF as well Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:00 ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] x86/entry/compat: In SYSENTER, sink AC clearing below the existing FLAGS test Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:01 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/entry/32: Filter NT and speed up AC filtering in SYSENTER Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:01 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] x86/entry/32: Restore FLAGS on SYSEXIT Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:01 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/traps: Clear TIF_BLOCKSTEP on all debug exceptions Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:02 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry/traps: " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/traps: Clear DR6 early in do_debug and improve the comment Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:02 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry/traps: Clear DR6 early in do_debug() " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] x86/entry: Vastly simplify SYSENTER TF handling Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:03 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry: Vastly simplify SYSENTER TF (single-step) handling tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] x86/entry: Only allocate space for SYSENTER_stack if needed Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:03 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry: Only allocate space for tss_struct::SYSENTER_stack " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] x86/entry/32: Simplify and fix up the SYSENTER stack #DB/NMI fixup Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:03 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] x86/entry/32: Add and check a stack canary for the SYSENTER stack Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:04 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] x86/entry: Remove TIF_SINGLESTEP entry work Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:04 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] x86/entry: Improve system call entry comments Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-10 11:05 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-a318beea224d255c38652f88a7ae0d30ac4c23c3@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox