[tip:efi/core] efi: Use 32-bit alignment for efi_guid_t

tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-04T09:44:06Z

Commit-ID: 494c704f9af0a0cddf593b381ea44320888733e6
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/494c704f9af0a0cddf593b381ea44320888733e6
Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
AuthorDate: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 10:41:13 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 08:26:35 +0100

efi: Use 32-bit alignment for efi_guid_t

The UEFI spec and EDK2 reference implementation both define EFI_GUID as
struct { u32 a; u16; b; u16 c; u8 d[8]; }; and so the implied alignment
is 32 bits not 8 bits like our guid_t. In some cases (i.e., on 32-bit ARM),
this means that firmware services invoked by the kernel may assume that
efi_guid_t* arguments are 32-bit aligned, and use memory accessors that
do not tolerate misalignment. So let's set the minimum alignment to 32 bits.

Note that the UEFI spec as well as some comments in the EDK2 code base
suggest that EFI_GUID should be 64-bit aligned, but this appears to be
a mistake, given that no code seems to exist that actually enforces that
or relies on it.

Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190202094119.13230-5-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/efi.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index 45ff763fba76..be08518c2553 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -48,7 +48,20 @@ typedef u16 efi_char16_t; /* UNICODE character */
typedef u64 efi_physical_addr_t;
typedef void *efi_handle_t;

-typedef guid_t efi_guid_t;
+/*
+ * The UEFI spec and EDK2 reference implementation both define EFI_GUID as
+ * struct { u32 a; u16; b; u16 c; u8 d[8]; }; and so the implied alignment
+ * is 32 bits not 8 bits like our guid_t. In some cases (i.e., on 32-bit ARM),
+ * this means that firmware services invoked by the kernel may assume that
+ * efi_guid_t* arguments are 32-bit aligned, and use memory accessors that
+ * do not tolerate misalignment. So let's set the minimum alignment to 32 bits.
+ *
+ * Note that the UEFI spec as well as some comments in the EDK2 code base
+ * suggest that EFI_GUID should be 64-bit aligned, but this appears to be
+ * a mistake, given that no code seems to exist that actually enforces that
+ * or relies on it.
+ */
+typedef guid_t efi_guid_t __aligned(__alignof__(u32));

#define EFI_GUID(a,b,c,d0,d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7) \
GUID_INIT(a, b, c, d0, d1, d2, d3, d4, d5, d6, d7)