public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: luto@kernel.org, dvlasenk@redhat.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, brgerst@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm: Fix UNWIND_HINT_REGS macro for older binutils
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 07:15:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-af79ded44b7c5eee46b433a9269fcf899372225b@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2ad97c1ae49a484644b4aaa4dd3faa4d6d969b2.1502116651.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>

Commit-ID:  af79ded44b7c5eee46b433a9269fcf899372225b
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/af79ded44b7c5eee46b433a9269fcf899372225b
Author:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:38:05 -0500
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:16:19 +0200

x86/asm: Fix UNWIND_HINT_REGS macro for older binutils

Apparently the binutils 2.20 assembler can't handle the '&&' operator in
the UNWIND_HINT_REGS macro.  Rearrange the macro to do without it.

This fixes the following error:

  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S: Assembler messages:
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement

Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 39358a033b2e ("objtool, x86: Add facility for asm code to provide unwind hints")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e2ad97c1ae49a484644b4aaa4dd3faa4d6d969b2.1502116651.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_hints.h | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_hints.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_hints.h
index 5e02b11..bae46fc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_hints.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_hints.h
@@ -44,10 +44,12 @@
 .endm
 
 .macro UNWIND_HINT_REGS base=%rsp offset=0 indirect=0 extra=1 iret=0
-	.if \base == %rsp && \indirect
-		.set sp_reg, ORC_REG_SP_INDIRECT
-	.elseif \base == %rsp
-		.set sp_reg, ORC_REG_SP
+	.if \base == %rsp
+		.if \indirect
+			.set sp_reg, ORC_REG_SP_INDIRECT
+		.else
+			.set sp_reg, ORC_REG_SP
+		.endif
 	.elseif \base == %rbp
 		.set sp_reg, ORC_REG_BP
 	.elseif \base == %rdi

      reply	other threads:[~2017-08-10 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-07 14:38 [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix UNWIND_HINT_REGS macro for older binutils Josh Poimboeuf
2017-08-10 14:15 ` tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-af79ded44b7c5eee46b433a9269fcf899372225b@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox