public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Hans de Goede <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	msalter@redhat.com, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, pjones@redhat.com,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, hdegoede@redhat.com,
	lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net
Subject: [tip:efi/core] efi/reboot: Fall back to original power-off method if EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN returns
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 02:17:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-b6a3780dad74f6e3d1d45eca843ae623cc3216a8@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170818194947.19347-7-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

Commit-ID:  b6a3780dad74f6e3d1d45eca843ae623cc3216a8
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/b6a3780dad74f6e3d1d45eca843ae623cc3216a8
Author:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:49:39 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:43:50 +0200

efi/reboot: Fall back to original power-off method if EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN returns

Commit:

  44be28e9dd98 ("x86/reboot: Add EFI reboot quirk for ACPI Hardware Reduced flag")

sets pm_power_off to efi_power_off() when the acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware
flag is set.

According to its commit message this is necessary because: "BayTrail-T
class of hardware requires EFI in order to powerdown and reboot and no
other reliable method exists".

But I have a Bay Trail CR tablet where the EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN call does
not work, it simply returns without doing anything (AFAICT).

So it seems that some Bay Trail devices must use EFI for power-off, while
for others only ACPI works.

Note that efi_power_off() only gets used if the platform code defines
efi_poweroff_required() and that returns true, this currently only ever
happens on x86.

Since on the devices which need ACPI for power-off the EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN
call simply returns, this patch makes the efi-reboot code remember the
old pm_power_off handler and if EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN returns it falls back
to calling that.

This seems preferable to dmi-quirking our way out of this, since there
are likely quite a few devices suffering from this.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170818194947.19347-7-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/reboot.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/reboot.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/reboot.c
index 62ead9b..7117e2d 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/reboot.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/reboot.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 #include <linux/efi.h>
 #include <linux/reboot.h>
 
+void (*orig_pm_power_off)(void);
+
 int efi_reboot_quirk_mode = -1;
 
 void efi_reboot(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *__unused)
@@ -51,6 +53,12 @@ bool __weak efi_poweroff_required(void)
 static void efi_power_off(void)
 {
 	efi.reset_system(EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN, EFI_SUCCESS, 0, NULL);
+	/*
+	 * The above call should not return, if it does fall back to
+	 * the original power off method (typically ACPI poweroff).
+	 */
+	if (orig_pm_power_off)
+		orig_pm_power_off();
 }
 
 static int __init efi_shutdown_init(void)
@@ -58,8 +66,10 @@ static int __init efi_shutdown_init(void)
 	if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	if (efi_poweroff_required())
+	if (efi_poweroff_required()) {
+		orig_pm_power_off = pm_power_off;
 		pm_power_off = efi_power_off;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-21  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-18 19:49 [GIT PULL 00/14] EFI changes for v4.14 Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 01/14] efi: arm: Don't mark ACPI reclaim memory as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:15   ` [tip:efi/core] efi/arm: " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 02/14] efi/libstub: arm64: use hidden attribute for struct screen_info reference Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:15   ` [tip:efi/core] efi/libstub/arm64: Use " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 03/14] efi/libstub: arm64: force 'hidden' visibility for section markers Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:16   ` [tip:efi/core] efi/libstub/arm64: Force " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 04/14] efi/libstub: arm64: set -fpie when building the EFI stub Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:16   ` [tip:efi/core] efi/libstub/arm64: Set " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 05/14] efi: arm/arm64: Add missing assignment of efi.config_table Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:17   ` [tip:efi/core] efi/arm/arm64: " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 06/14] efi/reboot: Fall back to original power-off method if EFI_RESET_SHUTDOWN returns Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:17   ` tip-bot for Hans de Goede [this message]
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 07/14] drivers/fbdev: efifb: allow BAR to be moved instead of claiming it Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:17   ` [tip:efi/core] drivers/fbdev/efifb: Allow " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 08/14] arm: efi: remove forbidden values from the PE/COFF header Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:18   ` [tip:efi/core] arm/efi: Remove " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 09/14] arm: efi: remove pointless dummy .reloc section Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:18   ` [tip:efi/core] arm/efi: Remove " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 10/14] arm: efi: replace open coded constants with symbolic ones Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:19   ` [tip:efi/core] arm/efi: Replace " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 11/14] arm: efi: split zImage code and data into separate PE/COFF sections Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:19   ` [tip:efi/core] arm/efi: Split " tip-bot for Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 12/14] firmware: dcdbas: constify attribute_group structures Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:19   ` [tip:efi/core] firmware/dcdbas: Constify " tip-bot for Arvind Yadav
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 13/14] firmware: efi: constify " Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:20   ` [tip:efi/core] firmware/efi: Constify " tip-bot for Arvind Yadav
2017-08-18 19:49 ` [PATCH 14/14] firmware: efi: esrt: constify " Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-21  9:20   ` [tip:efi/core] firmware/efi/esrt: Constify " tip-bot for Arvind Yadav
2017-08-21  9:34 ` [GIT PULL 00/14] EFI changes for v4.14 Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-b6a3780dad74f6e3d1d45eca843ae623cc3216a8@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox