public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, efault@gmx.de, davem@davemloft.net,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix cpu_clock() in NMIs, on !CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:11:09 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-b9f8fcd55bbdb037e5332dbdb7b494f0b70861ac@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091213.182502.215092085.davem@davemloft.net>

Commit-ID:  b9f8fcd55bbdb037e5332dbdb7b494f0b70861ac
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/b9f8fcd55bbdb037e5332dbdb7b494f0b70861ac
Author:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
AuthorDate: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:25:02 -0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:04:36 +0100

sched: Fix cpu_clock() in NMIs, on !CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK

Relax stable-sched-clock architectures to not save/disable/restore
hardirqs in cpu_clock().

The background is that I was trying to resolve a sparc64 perf
issue when I discovered this problem.

On sparc64 I implement pseudo NMIs by simply running the kernel
at IRQ level 14 when local_irq_disable() is called, this allows
performance counter events to still come in at IRQ level 15.

This doesn't work if any code in an NMI handler does
local_irq_save() or local_irq_disable() since the "disable" will
kick us back to cpu IRQ level 14 thus letting NMIs back in and
we recurse.

The only path which that does that in the perf event IRQ
handling path is the code supporting frequency based events.  It
uses cpu_clock().

cpu_clock() simply invokes sched_clock() with IRQs disabled.

And that's a fundamental bug all on it's own, particularly for
the HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK case.  NMIs can thus get into the
sched_clock() code interrupting the local IRQ disable code
sections of it.

Furthermore, for the not-HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK case, the IRQ
disabling done by cpu_clock() is just pure overhead and
completely unnecessary.

So the core problem is that sched_clock() is not NMI safe, but
we are invoking it from NMI contexts in the perf events code
(via cpu_clock()).

A less important issue is the overhead of IRQ disabling when it
isn't necessary in cpu_clock().

CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK architectures are not
affected by this patch.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <20091213.182502.215092085.davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/sched_clock.c |   23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched_clock.c b/kernel/sched_clock.c
index 479ce56..5b49613 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_clock.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_clock.c
@@ -236,6 +236,18 @@ void sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(u64 delta_ns)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event);
 
+unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
+{
+	unsigned long long clock;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+	return clock;
+}
+
 #else /* CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK */
 
 void sched_clock_init(void)
@@ -251,17 +263,12 @@ u64 sched_clock_cpu(int cpu)
 	return sched_clock();
 }
 
-#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK */
 
 unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
 {
-	unsigned long long clock;
-	unsigned long flags;
+	return sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+}
 
-	local_irq_save(flags);
-	clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK */
 
-	return clock;
-}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_clock);

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-15  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-14  2:25 cpu_clock() in NMIs David Miller
2009-12-14  9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-14 19:09   ` David Miller
2009-12-14 19:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-15  5:36       ` David Miller
2009-12-14 19:57     ` Mike Frysinger
2009-12-15  8:11 ` tip-bot for David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-b9f8fcd55bbdb037e5332dbdb7b494f0b70861ac@git.kernel.org \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox