public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Jin Yao <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: acme@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	yao.jin@intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf annotate: Remove hist__account_cycles() from callback
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 01:46:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-bdd1666b3d03d675bdb7f8d92b29f2797acbc5e8@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552684577-29041-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>

Commit-ID:  bdd1666b3d03d675bdb7f8d92b29f2797acbc5e8
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/bdd1666b3d03d675bdb7f8d92b29f2797acbc5e8
Author:     Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 05:16:17 +0800
Committer:  Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 15 May 2019 16:36:46 -0300

perf annotate: Remove hist__account_cycles() from callback

The hist__account_cycles() function is executed when the
hist_iter__branch_callback() is called.

But it looks it's not necessary.  In hist__account_cycles, it already
walks on all branch entries.

This patch moves the hist__account_cycles out of callback, now the data
processing is much faster than before.

Previous code has an issue that the ch[offset].num++ (in
__symbol__account_cycles) is executed repeatedly since
hist__account_cycles is called in each hist_iter__branch_callback, so
the counting of ch[offset].num is not correct (too big).

With this patch, the issue is fixed. And we don't need the code of
"ch->reset >= ch->num / 2" to check if there are too many overlaps (in
annotation__count_and_fill), otherwise some data would be hidden.

Now, we can try, for example:

  perf record -b ...
  perf annotate or perf report -s symbol

The before/after output should be no change.

 v3:
 ---
 Fix the crash in stdio mode.
 Like previous code, it needs the checking of ui__has_annotation()
 before hist__account_cycles()

 v2:
 ---
 1. Cover the similar perf report
 2. Remove the checking code "ch->reset >= ch->num / 2"

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1552684577-29041-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c |  4 ++--
 tools/perf/builtin-report.c   | 11 +++++------
 tools/perf/util/annotate.c    |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
index 67f9d9ffacfb..77deb3a40596 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -159,8 +159,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
 	struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
 	int err;
 
-	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
-
 	bi = he->branch_info;
 	err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
 
@@ -199,6 +197,8 @@ static int process_branch_callback(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
 	if (a.map != NULL)
 		a.map->dso->hit = 1;
 
+	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
+
 	ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &a, PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH, ann);
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index 4054eb1f98ac..91e27ac297c2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -136,9 +136,6 @@ static int hist_iter__report_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
 	if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
 		return 0;
 
-	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-			     rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
 	if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
 		bi = he->branch_info;
 		err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
@@ -181,9 +178,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
 	if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
 		return 0;
 
-	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-			     rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
 	bi = he->branch_info;
 	err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
 	if (err)
@@ -282,6 +276,11 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
 	if (al.map != NULL)
 		al.map->dso->hit = 1;
 
+	if (ui__has_annotation() || rep->symbol_ipc) {
+		hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, &al, sample,
+				     rep->nonany_branch_mode);
+	}
+
 	ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &al, rep->max_stack, rep);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		pr_debug("problem adding hist entry, skipping event\n");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 09762985c713..0b8573fd9b05 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ static void annotation__count_and_fill(struct annotation *notes, u64 start, u64
 		float ipc = n_insn / ((double)ch->cycles / (double)ch->num);
 
 		/* Hide data when there are too many overlaps. */
-		if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff || ch->reset >= ch->num / 2)
+		if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff)
 			return;
 
 		for (offset = start; offset <= end; offset++) {

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-18  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-15 21:16 [PATCH v3] perf annotate/report: Remove hist__account_cycles from callback Jin Yao
2019-03-20  0:35 ` Jin, Yao
2019-03-20  1:47   ` Andi Kleen
2019-04-10 13:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-18  8:46 ` tip-bot for Jin Yao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-bdd1666b3d03d675bdb7f8d92b29f2797acbc5e8@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox