From: "tip-bot for Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@kernel.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
joel@joelfernandes.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Speed up calling of RCU tasks callbacks
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 02:11:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-c03be752d39dc64dcfda0ac8ce87fb10b1ee5621@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180523063815.198302-2-joel@joelfernandes.org>
Commit-ID: c03be752d39dc64dcfda0ac8ce87fb10b1ee5621
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c03be752d39dc64dcfda0ac8ce87fb10b1ee5621
Author: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 24 May 2018 18:49:46 -0400
Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CommitDate: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:39:21 -0700
rcu: Speed up calling of RCU tasks callbacks
Joel Fernandes found that the synchronize_rcu_tasks() was taking a
significant amount of time. He demonstrated it with the following test:
# cd /sys/kernel/tracing
# while [ 1 ]; do x=1; done &
# echo '__schedule_bug:traceon' > set_ftrace_filter
# time echo '!__schedule_bug:traceon' > set_ftrace_filter;
real 0m1.064s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.004s
Where it takes a little over a second to perform the synchronize,
because there's a loop that waits 1 second at a time for tasks to get
through their quiescent points when there's a task that must be waited
for.
After discussion we came up with a simple way to wait for holdouts but
increase the time for each iteration of the loop but no more than a
full second.
With the new patch we have:
# time echo '!__schedule_bug:traceon' > set_ftrace_filter;
real 0m0.131s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.004s
Which drops it down to 13% of what the original wait time was.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180523063815.198302-2-joel@joelfernandes.org
Reported-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/update.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index 5783bdf86e5a..4c7c49c106ee 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -668,6 +668,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
struct rcu_head *list;
struct rcu_head *next;
LIST_HEAD(rcu_tasks_holdouts);
+ int fract;
/* Run on housekeeping CPUs by default. Sysadm can move if desired. */
housekeeping_affine(current, HK_FLAG_RCU);
@@ -749,13 +750,25 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
* holdouts. When the list is empty, we are done.
*/
lastreport = jiffies;
- while (!list_empty(&rcu_tasks_holdouts)) {
+
+ /* Start off with HZ/10 wait and slowly back off to 1 HZ wait*/
+ fract = 10;
+
+ for (;;) {
bool firstreport;
bool needreport;
int rtst;
struct task_struct *t1;
- schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ);
+ if (list_empty(&rcu_tasks_holdouts))
+ break;
+
+ /* Slowly back off waiting for holdouts */
+ schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ/fract);
+
+ if (fract > 1)
+ fract--;
+
rtst = READ_ONCE(rcu_task_stall_timeout);
needreport = rtst > 0 &&
time_after(jiffies, lastreport + rtst);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-17 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-23 6:38 [PATCH 0/4] cleanups, fixes for rcu/dev Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23 6:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] rcu: Speed up calling of RCU tasks callbacks Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23 15:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23 16:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-23 17:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23 19:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-23 20:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23 21:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-24 0:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-24 1:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-24 21:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-24 22:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-24 22:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-17 9:11 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Add comment to the last sleep in the rcu tasks loop tip-bot for Steven Rostedt (VMware)
2018-07-17 9:11 ` tip-bot for Steven Rostedt (VMware) [this message]
2018-05-23 6:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23 16:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23 6:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] rcu: Use better variable names in funnel locking loop Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23 16:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-24 0:54 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-24 1:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23 6:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] rcu: Identify grace period is in progress as we advance up the tree Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23 16:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-c03be752d39dc64dcfda0ac8ce87fb10b1ee5621@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).