From: tip-bot for Kan Liang <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, kan.liang@intel.com, acme@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, zheng.z.yan@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box_init() out of driver initialization
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:28:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421729665-5912-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
Commit-ID: c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc
Author: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:54:25 +0000
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 13:04:34 +0100
perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box_init() out of driver initialization
There were some issues about the uncore driver tried to access
non-existing boxes, which caused boot crashes. These issues have
been all fixed. But we should avoid boot failures if that ever
happens again.
This patch intends to prevent this kind of potential issues.
It moves uncore_box_init out of driver initialization. The box
will be initialized when it's first enabled.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421729665-5912-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 9 ++-------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 18 ++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index 10b8d3e..c635b8b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -840,7 +840,6 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
box->phys_id = phys_id;
box->pci_dev = pdev;
box->pmu = pmu;
- uncore_box_init(box);
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, box);
raw_spin_lock(&uncore_box_lock);
@@ -1004,10 +1003,8 @@ static int uncore_cpu_starting(int cpu)
pmu = &type->pmus[j];
box = *per_cpu_ptr(pmu->box, cpu);
/* called by uncore_cpu_init? */
- if (box && box->phys_id >= 0) {
- uncore_box_init(box);
+ if (box && box->phys_id >= 0)
continue;
- }
for_each_online_cpu(k) {
exist = *per_cpu_ptr(pmu->box, k);
@@ -1023,10 +1020,8 @@ static int uncore_cpu_starting(int cpu)
}
}
- if (box) {
+ if (box)
box->phys_id = phys_id;
- uncore_box_init(box);
- }
}
}
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
index 863d9b0..6c8c1e7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
@@ -257,6 +257,14 @@ static inline int uncore_num_counters(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
return box->pmu->type->num_counters;
}
+static inline void uncore_box_init(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
+{
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIATED, &box->flags)) {
+ if (box->pmu->type->ops->init_box)
+ box->pmu->type->ops->init_box(box);
+ }
+}
+
static inline void uncore_disable_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
if (box->pmu->type->ops->disable_box)
@@ -265,6 +273,8 @@ static inline void uncore_disable_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
static inline void uncore_enable_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
+ uncore_box_init(box);
+
if (box->pmu->type->ops->enable_box)
box->pmu->type->ops->enable_box(box);
}
@@ -287,14 +297,6 @@ static inline u64 uncore_read_counter(struct intel_uncore_box *box,
return box->pmu->type->ops->read_counter(box, event);
}
-static inline void uncore_box_init(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
-{
- if (!test_and_set_bit(UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIATED, &box->flags)) {
- if (box->pmu->type->ops->init_box)
- box->pmu->type->ops->init_box(box);
- }
-}
-
static inline bool uncore_box_is_fake(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
return (box->phys_id < 0);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-28 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 4:54 [PATCH 1/1] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box_init out of driver initialization kan.liang
2015-01-28 14:28 ` tip-bot for Kan Liang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox