public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Joonsoo Kim <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org, davidlohr.bueso@hp.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, peterz@infradead.org, jason.low2@hp.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Don' t consider other cpus in our group in case of NEWLY_IDLE
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:35:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-cfc03118047172f5bdc58d63c607d16d33ce5305@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366705662-3587-4-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

Commit-ID:  cfc03118047172f5bdc58d63c607d16d33ce5305
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/cfc03118047172f5bdc58d63c607d16d33ce5305
Author:     Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:27:39 +0900
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:52:44 +0200

sched: Don't consider other cpus in our group in case of NEWLY_IDLE

Commit 88b8dac0 makes load_balance() consider other cpus in its
group, regardless of idle type. When we do NEWLY_IDLE balancing,
we should not consider it, because a motivation of NEWLY_IDLE
balancing is to turn this cpu to non idle state if needed. This
is not the case of other cpus. So, change code not to consider
other cpus for NEWLY_IDLE balancing.

With this patch, assign 'if (pulled_task) this_rq->idle_stamp =
0' in idle_balance() is corrected, because NEWLY_IDLE balancing
doesn't consider other cpus. Assigning to 'this_rq->idle_stamp'
is now valid.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Tested-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1366705662-3587-4-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 726e129..dfa92b7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5026,8 +5026,21 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
 		.cpus		= cpus,
 	};
 
+	/*
+	 * For NEWLY_IDLE load_balancing, we don't need to consider
+	 * other cpus in our group
+	 */
+	if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) {
+		env.dst_grpmask = NULL;
+		/*
+		 * we don't care max_lb_iterations in this case,
+		 * in following patch, this will be removed
+		 */
+		max_lb_iterations = 0;
+	} else
+		max_lb_iterations = cpumask_weight(env.dst_grpmask);
+
 	cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask);
-	max_lb_iterations = cpumask_weight(env.dst_grpmask);
 
 	schedstat_inc(sd, lb_count[idle]);
 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-24  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-23  8:27 [PATCH v3 0/6] correct load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-23  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] sched: change position of resched_cpu() in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-24  9:32   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Change " tip-bot for Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-23  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-24  9:33   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Explicitly " tip-bot for Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-23  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] sched: don't consider other cpus in our group in case of NEWLY_IDLE Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-24  9:35   ` tip-bot for Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-04-23  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched: move up affinity check to mitigate useless redoing overhead Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-24  9:36   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Move " tip-bot for Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-23  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] sched: rename load_balance_tmpmask to load_balance_mask Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-24  9:37   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Rename " tip-bot for Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-23  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] sched: prevent to re-select dst-cpu in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-24  9:38   ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Prevent " tip-bot for Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-cfc03118047172f5bdc58d63c607d16d33ce5305@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox