linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Michal Hocko <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dbueso@suse.de, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	chris@zankel.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, davem@davemloft.net, jason.low2@hp.com,
	mhocko@suse.com
Subject: [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: Introduce basis for down_write_killable()
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:34:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-d47996082f52baa0ca8b48d26b3cbef5ede70a73@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460041951-22347-7-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>

Commit-ID:  d47996082f52baa0ca8b48d26b3cbef5ede70a73
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/d47996082f52baa0ca8b48d26b3cbef5ede70a73
Author:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:12:26 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:42:20 +0200

locking/rwsem: Introduce basis for down_write_killable()

Introduce a generic implementation necessary for down_write_killable().

This is a trivial extension of the already existing down_write() call
which can be interrupted by SIGKILL.  This patch doesn't provide
down_write_killable() yet because arches have to provide the necessary
pieces before.

rwsem_down_write_failed() which is a generic slow path for the
write lock is extended to take a task state and renamed to
__rwsem_down_write_failed_common(). The return value is either a valid
semaphore pointer or ERR_PTR(-EINTR).

rwsem_down_write_failed_killable() is exported as a new way to wait for
the lock and be killable.

For rwsem-spinlock implementation the current __down_write() it updated
in a similar way as __rwsem_down_write_failed_common() except it doesn't
need new exports just visible __down_write_killable().

Architectures which are not using the generic rwsem implementation are
supposed to provide their __down_write_killable() implementation and
use rwsem_down_write_failed_killable() for the slow path.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460041951-22347-7-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 include/asm-generic/rwsem.h     | 12 ++++++++++++
 include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h  |  1 +
 include/linux/rwsem.h           |  2 ++
 kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c     | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
index b8d8a6c..3fc94a0 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
@@ -63,6 +63,18 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 		rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
 }
 
+static inline int __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	long tmp;
+
+	tmp = atomic_long_add_return_acquire(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
+				     (atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
+	if (unlikely(tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS))
+		if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(sem)))
+			return -EINTR;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	long tmp;
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h b/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
index a733a54..ae0528b 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore {
 extern void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int __must_check __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index 8f498cd..7d7ae02 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
 #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
 #include <linux/osq_lock.h>
 #endif
@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore {
 
 extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *);
 extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
index bab2610..1591f6b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
@@ -191,11 +191,12 @@ int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 /*
  * get a write lock on the semaphore
  */
-void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
 {
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
 
@@ -215,16 +216,33 @@ void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 		 */
 		if (sem->count == 0)
 			break;
-		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			goto out;
+		}
+		set_task_state(tsk, state);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
 		schedule();
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
 	}
 	/* got the lock */
 	sem->count = -1;
+out:
 	list_del(&waiter.list);
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	__down_write_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+}
+
+int __sched __down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	return __down_write_common(sem, TASK_KILLABLE);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index a4d4de0..df4dcb8 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -433,12 +433,13 @@ static inline bool rwsem_has_spinner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 /*
  * Wait until we successfully acquire the write lock
  */
-__visible
-struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+static inline struct rw_semaphore *
+__rwsem_down_write_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
 {
 	long count;
 	bool waiting = true; /* any queued threads before us */
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
+	struct rw_semaphore *ret = sem;
 
 	/* undo write bias from down_write operation, stop active locking */
 	count = rwsem_atomic_update(-RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS, sem);
@@ -478,7 +479,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 		count = rwsem_atomic_update(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, sem);
 
 	/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
-	set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	set_current_state(state);
 	while (true) {
 		if (rwsem_try_write_lock(count, sem))
 			break;
@@ -486,21 +487,39 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 
 		/* Block until there are no active lockers. */
 		do {
+			if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
+				raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
+				ret = ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
+				goto out;
+			}
 			schedule();
-			set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+			set_current_state(state);
 		} while ((count = sem->count) & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK);
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
 	}
+out:
 	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-
 	list_del(&waiter.list);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
 
-	return sem;
+	return ret;
+}
+
+__visible struct rw_semaphore * __sched
+rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	return __rwsem_down_write_failed_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_write_failed);
 
+__visible struct rw_semaphore * __sched
+rwsem_down_write_failed_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	return __rwsem_down_write_failed_common(sem, TASK_KILLABLE);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_write_failed_killable);
+
 /*
  * handle waking up a waiter on the semaphore
  * - up_read/up_write has decremented the active part of count if we come here

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-13 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-07 15:12 [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore v3 Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:32   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: Get rid of __down_write_nested() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:32   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: Drop " tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 03/11] xtensa, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:33   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, xtensa: Drop " tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 04/11] sh, rwsem: drop " Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:33   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, sh: Drop " tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 05/11] sparc, rwsem: drop " Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:33   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, sparc: Drop " tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 06/11] locking, rwsem: introduce basis for down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:34   ` tip-bot for Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 07/11] alpha, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:42   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, alpha: Provide __down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 08/11] ia64, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 17:28   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-08  6:22     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:43   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, ia64: Provide __down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 09/11] s390, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:43   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, s390: Provide __down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-13  9:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13  9:16     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13  9:19       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13 10:27         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13 12:49           ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-17 16:59             ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 13:40             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-20 18:04               ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-20 20:45                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-20 20:58                   ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 21:06                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-20 21:36                     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-20 22:29                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-21 11:35                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 13:09                           ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-21 13:21                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-27 12:02                         ` [PATCH] x86/locking/rwsem: Cleanup ____down_write() Borislav Petkov
2016-04-28 10:27                           ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, x86: Clean up ____down_write() tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-04-22  6:53               ` [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13  9:57   ` [PATCH] x86: add frame annotation for call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:44     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, x86: Add frame annotation for call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:43   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, x86: Provide __down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 11/11] locking, rwsem: provide down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:44   ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: Provide down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-12  9:37 ` [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore v3 Michal Hocko
2016-04-12 15:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-12 18:01     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-d47996082f52baa0ca8b48d26b3cbef5ede70a73@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).