* [PATCH] sched/core: Fix rq lock pinning warning after call balance callbacks
@ 2017-03-17 2:45 Wanpeng Li
2017-03-23 9:11 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Wanpeng Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wanpeng Li @ 2017-03-17 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Wanpeng Li, Mike Galbraith,
Thomas Gleixner
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
This can be reproduced by running rt-migrate-test:
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2195 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3670 lock_unpin_lock+0x172/0x180
unpinning an unpinned lock
CPU: 2 PID: 2195 Comm: rt-migrate-test Tainted: G W 4.11.0-rc2+ #1
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
__warn+0xcb/0xf0
warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80
lock_unpin_lock+0x172/0x180
__balance_callback+0x75/0x90
__schedule+0x83f/0xc00
? futex_wait_setup+0x82/0x130
schedule+0x3d/0x90
futex_wait_queue_me+0xd4/0x170
futex_wait+0x119/0x260
? __lock_acquire+0x4c8/0x1900
? stop_one_cpu+0x94/0xc0
do_futex+0x2fe/0xc10
? sched_setaffinity+0x1c1/0x290
SyS_futex+0x81/0x190
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x72/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x73/0x1f0
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
We utilize balance callbacks to delay the load-balancing operations
{rt,dl}*{push,pull} until we've done all the important work. The
push/pull operations can unlock/lock the current rq for safety acquires
the src's and dest's rq->locks in a fair way. It's safe to drop the
rq lock here, unpin and repin to avoid the splat.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c762f62..cd901f6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2787,7 +2787,9 @@ static void __balance_callback(struct rq *rq)
head->next = NULL;
head = next;
+ rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf);
func(rq);
+ rq_repin_lock(rq, &rf);
}
rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Fix rq lock pinning warning after call balance callbacks
2017-03-17 2:45 [PATCH] sched/core: Fix rq lock pinning warning after call balance callbacks Wanpeng Li
@ 2017-03-23 9:11 ` tip-bot for Wanpeng Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Wanpeng Li @ 2017-03-23 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: mingo, wanpeng.li, hpa, peterz, fengguang.wu, linux-kernel, tglx,
torvalds, efault
Commit-ID: d7921a5ddab8d30e06e321f37eec629f23797486
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d7921a5ddab8d30e06e321f37eec629f23797486
Author: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 19:45:19 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:44:51 +0100
sched/core: Fix rq lock pinning warning after call balance callbacks
This can be reproduced by running rt-migrate-test:
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2195 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3670 lock_unpin_lock()
unpinning an unpinned lock
...
Call Trace:
dump_stack()
__warn()
warn_slowpath_fmt()
lock_unpin_lock()
__balance_callback()
__schedule()
schedule()
futex_wait_queue_me()
futex_wait()
do_futex()
SyS_futex()
do_syscall_64()
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path()
Revert the rq_lock_irqsave() usage here, the whole point of the
balance_callback() was to allow dropping rq->lock.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 8a8c69c32778 ("sched/core: Add rq->lock wrappers")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1489718719-3951-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c762f62..ab9f6ac 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2776,9 +2776,9 @@ static void __balance_callback(struct rq *rq)
{
struct callback_head *head, *next;
void (*func)(struct rq *rq);
- struct rq_flags rf;
+ unsigned long flags;
- rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
head = rq->balance_callback;
rq->balance_callback = NULL;
while (head) {
@@ -2789,7 +2789,7 @@ static void __balance_callback(struct rq *rq)
func(rq);
}
- rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
}
static inline void balance_callback(struct rq *rq)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-23 9:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-17 2:45 [PATCH] sched/core: Fix rq lock pinning warning after call balance callbacks Wanpeng Li
2017-03-23 9:11 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Wanpeng Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox