linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	andreas.herrmann3@amd.com, sp@numascale.com, bp@amd64.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, daniel@numascale-asia.com,
	borislav.petkov@amd.com
Subject: [tip:x86/platform] x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id()
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 04:07:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-d7dedbe3694bbf97b4e3409e1fa52d97a3b9f028@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120224153127.GD28921@alberich.amd.com>

Commit-ID:  d7dedbe3694bbf97b4e3409e1fa52d97a3b9f028
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/d7dedbe3694bbf97b4e3409e1fa52d97a3b9f028
Author:     Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:31:27 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:35:47 +0100

x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id()

It's only called from amd.c:srat_detect_node(). The introduced
condition for calling the fixup code is true for all AMD
multi-node processors, e.g. Magny-Cours and Interlagos. There we
have 2 NUMA nodes on one socket. Thus there are cores having
different numa-node-id but with equal phys_proc_id.

There is no point to print error messages in such a situation.

The confusing/misleading error message was introduced with
commit 64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda (x86: Add
x86_init platform override to fix up NUMA core numbering).

Change the default fixup function (remove the error message),
move the Numascale-specific condition for calling the fixup into
the fixup-function itself and slightly adapt the comment.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120224153127.GD28921@alberich.amd.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h      |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c |    7 +++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c            |    8 ++++----
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c         |    9 ---------
 arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c           |    1 +
 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
index 517d476..1bcacef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
@@ -189,6 +189,6 @@ extern struct x86_msi_ops x86_msi;
 
 extern void x86_init_noop(void);
 extern void x86_init_uint_noop(unsigned int unused);
-extern void x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node);
+extern void x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int n);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
index 09d3d8c..ade0182 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
@@ -201,8 +201,11 @@ static void __init map_csrs(void)
 
 static void fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
 {
-	c->phys_proc_id = node;
-	per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node;
+
+	if (c->phys_proc_id != node) {
+		c->phys_proc_id = node;
+		per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node;
+	}
 }
 
 static int __init numachip_system_init(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index f4773f4..52b7287 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -352,11 +352,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu);
 
 	/*
-	 * If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform,
-	 * so invoke platform-specific handler
+	 * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a
+	 * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some
+	 * IDs of the CPU.
 	 */
-	if (c->phys_proc_id != node)
-		x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);
+	x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);
 
 	if (!node_online(node)) {
 		/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index d43cad7..37da7a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1158,15 +1158,6 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void)
 #endif /* ! CONFIG_KGDB */
 
 /*
- * Prints an error where the NUMA and configured core-number mismatch and the
- * platform didn't override this to fix it up
- */
-void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
-{
-	pr_err("NUMA core number %d differs from configured core number %d\n", node, c->phys_proc_id);
-}
-
-/*
  * cpu_init() initializes state that is per-CPU. Some data is already
  * initialized (naturally) in the bootstrap process, such as the GDT
  * and IDT. We reload them nevertheless, this function acts as a
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
index 947a06c..67cf78a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct x86_init_ops x86_init __initdata = {
 	},
 };
 
+void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int n) { }
 struct x86_cpuinit_ops x86_cpuinit __cpuinitdata = {
 	.setup_percpu_clockev		= setup_secondary_APIC_clock,
 	.fixup_cpu_id			= x86_default_fixup_cpu_id,

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-27 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-20 17:17 [PATCH] x86: Remove wrong error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-21 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 11:05   ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-21 11:20     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 12:56       ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-22 13:47     ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-23 10:23       ` Daniel J Blueman
2012-02-24 15:31         ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-02-27 12:07           ` tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2012-02-28 15:27             ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id() Borislav Petkov
2012-02-28 16:42           ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2012-03-02 11:04             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-02 11:51               ` Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-02 16:06                 ` [PATCH resend] " Andreas Herrmann
2012-04-04 12:38                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 17:31                     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-16 18:53                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-d7dedbe3694bbf97b4e3409e1fa52d97a3b9f028@git.kernel.org \
    --to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sp@numascale.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).