From: tip-bot for Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
robert.richter@amd.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@linux.intel.com
Subject: [tip:x86/xsave] x86, xsave: 32/64 bit boot cpu check unification in initialization
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:40:04 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-db10db48b2c530def21bfd76d576702c7df7f620@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279651857-24639-3-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com>
Commit-ID: db10db48b2c530def21bfd76d576702c7df7f620
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/db10db48b2c530def21bfd76d576702c7df7f620
Author: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:50:49 +0200
Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
CommitDate: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:21:38 -0700
x86, xsave: 32/64 bit boot cpu check unification in initialization
Boot cpu id is always 0, thus simplifying and unifying boot cpu check.
boot_cpu_id is there for historical reasons and was renamed to
boot_cpu_physical_apicid in patch:
c70dcb7 x86: change boot_cpu_id to boot_cpu_physical_apicid
However, there are some remaining occurrences of boot_cpu_id that are
never touched in the kernel and thus its value is always 0.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <1279651857-24639-3-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com>
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 3f715ef..26804b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ void __cpuinit cpu_init(void)
/*
* Boot processor to setup the FP and extended state context info.
*/
- if (smp_processor_id() == boot_cpu_id)
+ if (!smp_processor_id())
init_thread_xstate();
xsave_init();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-21 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-20 18:50 [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks Robert Richter
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86, xsave: do not include asm/i387.h in asm/xsave.h Robert Richter
2010-07-20 21:46 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 02/10] x86, xsave: 32/64 bit boot cpu check unification in initialization Robert Richter
2010-07-20 21:47 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-21 0:40 ` tip-bot for Robert Richter [this message]
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 03/10] x86: removing boot_cpu_id variable Robert Richter
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86, xsave: moving boot cpu initialization to xsave_init() Robert Richter
2010-07-20 21:48 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-21 0:40 ` [tip:x86/xsave] x86, xsave: Move " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86, xsave: make xsave_cntxt_init() static Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:20 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-21 13:48 ` Robert Richter
2010-07-21 16:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 06/10] x86, xsave: do not initialize xsave in fpu_init() Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:21 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86, xsave: reduce cpu_has_xsave checks Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:22 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 08/10] x86, xsave: introduce xstate enable functions Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:23 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86, xsave: check cpuid level for XSTATE_CPUID (0x0d) Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:26 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 22:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-20 22:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-20 18:50 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86, xsave: make init_xstate_buf static Robert Richter
2010-07-20 22:26 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 19:27 ` [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-20 19:46 ` Robert Richter
2010-07-20 20:05 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-20 20:07 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-20 20:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 16:16 ` Robert Richter
2010-07-21 16:29 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 16:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-21 16:52 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 17:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 17:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-21 17:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 17:24 ` Robert Richter
2010-07-21 17:37 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-21 19:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-07-20 20:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-db10db48b2c530def21bfd76d576702c7df7f620@git.kernel.org \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox