From: tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, bp@suse.de,
mingo@kernel.org, tv@lio96.de, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_intel variable to mc
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:23:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-de778275c295825e6638f3f74103f40642d45caa@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454499225-21544-10-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
Commit-ID: de778275c295825e6638f3f74103f40642d45caa
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/de778275c295825e6638f3f74103f40642d45caa
Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:33:37 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:41:17 +0100
x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_intel variable to mc
Well, it is apparent what it points to - microcode. And since it is the
intel loader, no need for the "_intel" suffix. Use "!" for the 0/NULL
checks, while at it.
No functionality change.
Tested-by: Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454499225-21544-10-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 9f5fe72..d1b2f58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -601,19 +601,19 @@ void show_ucode_info_early(void)
*/
static void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
{
- struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+ struct microcode_intel *mc;
int *delay_ucode_info_p;
int *current_mc_date_p;
- mc_intel = uci->mc;
- if (mc_intel == NULL)
+ mc = uci->mc;
+ if (!mc)
return;
delay_ucode_info_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&delay_ucode_info);
current_mc_date_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(¤t_mc_date);
*delay_ucode_info_p = 1;
- *current_mc_date_p = mc_intel->hdr.date;
+ *current_mc_date_p = mc->hdr.date;
}
#else
@@ -628,29 +628,29 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_early(void)
static inline void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
{
- struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+ struct microcode_intel *mc;
- mc_intel = uci->mc;
- if (mc_intel == NULL)
+ mc = uci->mc;
+ if (!mc)
return;
- print_ucode_info(uci, mc_intel->hdr.date);
+ print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
}
#endif
static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
{
- struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+ struct microcode_intel *mc;
unsigned int val[2];
- mc_intel = uci->mc;
- if (mc_intel == NULL)
+ mc = uci->mc;
+ if (!mc)
return 0;
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
native_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE,
- (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits,
- (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits >> 16 >> 16);
+ (unsigned long)mc->bits,
+ (unsigned long)mc->bits >> 16 >> 16);
native_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
native_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
- if (val[1] != mc_intel->hdr.rev)
+ if (val[1] != mc->hdr.rev)
return -1;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
if (early)
print_ucode(uci);
else
- print_ucode_info(uci, mc_intel->hdr.date);
+ print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
return 0;
}
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
* return 0 - no update found
* return 1 - found update
*/
-static int get_matching_mc(struct microcode_intel *mc_intel, int cpu)
+static int get_matching_mc(struct microcode_intel *mc, int cpu)
{
struct cpu_signature cpu_sig;
unsigned int csig, cpf, crev;
@@ -832,38 +832,38 @@ static int get_matching_mc(struct microcode_intel *mc_intel, int cpu)
cpf = cpu_sig.pf;
crev = cpu_sig.rev;
- return has_newer_microcode(mc_intel, csig, cpf, crev);
+ return has_newer_microcode(mc, csig, cpf, crev);
}
static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
{
- struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+ struct microcode_intel *mc;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
unsigned int val[2];
int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
- mc_intel = uci->mc;
+ mc = uci->mc;
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu);
- if (mc_intel == NULL)
+ if (!mc)
return 0;
/*
* Microcode on this CPU could be updated earlier. Only apply the
- * microcode patch in mc_intel when it is newer than the one on this
+ * microcode patch in mc when it is newer than the one on this
* CPU.
*/
- if (get_matching_mc(mc_intel, cpu) == 0)
+ if (!get_matching_mc(mc, cpu))
return 0;
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE,
- (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits,
- (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits >> 16 >> 16);
+ (unsigned long) mc->bits,
+ (unsigned long) mc->bits >> 16 >> 16);
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
@@ -872,16 +872,16 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
- if (val[1] != mc_intel->hdr.rev) {
+ if (val[1] != mc->hdr.rev) {
pr_err("CPU%d update to revision 0x%x failed\n",
- cpu_num, mc_intel->hdr.rev);
+ cpu_num, mc->hdr.rev);
return -1;
}
pr_info("CPU%d updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
cpu_num, val[1],
- mc_intel->hdr.date & 0xffff,
- mc_intel->hdr.date >> 24,
- (mc_intel->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
+ mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
+ mc->hdr.date >> 24,
+ (mc->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
c->microcode = val[1];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-09 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-03 11:33 [PATCH 00/17] x86/microcode: Untangle loader from BLK_DEV_INITRD Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 01/17] x86/microcode: Untangle " Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:20 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 02/17] x86/microcode/intel: Make early loader look for builtin microcode too Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:20 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 03/17] x86/microcode: Remove redundant __setup() param parsing Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:21 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 04/17] x86/microcode: Remove an unneeded NULL check Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20140120103046.GC14233@elgon.mountain>
2016-02-09 12:21 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Dan Carpenter
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 05/17] x86/microcode: Issue update message only once Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:21 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 06/17] x86/microcode/AMD: Drop redundant printk prefix Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:22 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 07/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename local variables of type struct mc_saved_data Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:22 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 08/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_saved_count to num_saved Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:22 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 09/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_intel variable to mc Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:23 ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 10/17] x86/microcode/intel: Move the BUG_ON up and turn it into WARN_ON Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:23 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 11/17] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup apply_microcode_intel() Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:24 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 12/17] x86/microcode/intel: Use *wrmsrl variants Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:24 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 13/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_saved_in_initrd Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:24 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 14/17] x86/microcode/intel: Remove unused arg of get_matching_model_microcode() Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:25 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 15/17] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup get_matching_model_microcode() Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:25 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 16/17] x86/microcode/AMD: Issue microcode updated message later Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:25 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 17/17] x86/microcode: Document builtin microcode loading method Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:26 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-de778275c295825e6638f3f74103f40642d45caa@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tv@lio96.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox