From: tip-bot for Aravind Gopalakrishnan <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com,
efault@gmx.de, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, riel@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Fix NUMA_DIRECT topology identification
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:37:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-e237882b8f83dd1a0eece1608bcb689d4f4b221b@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439256048-3748-1-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
Commit-ID: e237882b8f83dd1a0eece1608bcb689d4f4b221b
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e237882b8f83dd1a0eece1608bcb689d4f4b221b
Author: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:20:48 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:06:08 +0200
sched/numa: Fix NUMA_DIRECT topology identification
Systems which have all nodes at a distance of at most 1 hop should be
identified as 'NUMA_DIRECT'.
However, the scheduler incorrectly identifies it as 'NUMA_BACKPLANE'.
This is because 'n' is assigned to sched_max_numa_distance but the
code (mis)interprets it to mean 'number of hops'.
Rik had actually used sched_domains_numa_levels for detecting a
'NUMA_DIRECT' topology:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141279712429834&w=2
But that was changed when he removed the hops table in the
subsequent version:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141353106106771&w=2
Fixing the issue here.
Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439256048-3748-1-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b11f624..ea6d743 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6444,8 +6444,10 @@ static void init_numa_topology_type(void)
n = sched_max_numa_distance;
- if (n <= 1)
+ if (sched_domains_numa_levels <= 1) {
sched_numa_topology_type = NUMA_DIRECT;
+ return;
+ }
for_each_online_node(a) {
for_each_online_node(b) {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-11 1:20 [PATCH] sched/numa: Fix NUMA_DIRECT topology identification Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-08-11 1:06 ` Rik van Riel
2015-08-12 12:37 ` tip-bot for Aravind Gopalakrishnan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-e237882b8f83dd1a0eece1608bcb689d4f4b221b@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox