public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:core/urgent] rcu: Make rcu_read_lock_sched_held() handle !PREEMPT
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:32:35 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-e6033e3b307fcfae08408e0673266db38392bda4@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267667418-32233-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Commit-ID:  e6033e3b307fcfae08408e0673266db38392bda4
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/e6033e3b307fcfae08408e0673266db38392bda4
Author:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:50:16 -0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:07:33 +0100

rcu: Make rcu_read_lock_sched_held() handle !PREEMPT

The rcu_read_lock_sched_held() needs to unconditionally return
the value "1" in a !PREEMPT kernel, because under !PREEMPT,
-all- kernel code is implicitly preempt-disabled.  This patch
makes this happen.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
LKML-Reference: <1267667418-32233-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h |   14 ++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index c843736..e22960e 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void)
  * can prove otherwise.  Note that disabling of preemption (including
  * disabling irqs) counts as an RCU-sched read-side critical section.
  */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
 {
 	int lockdep_opinion = 0;
@@ -144,6 +145,12 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
 		lockdep_opinion = lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
 	return lockdep_opinion || preempt_count() != 0 || !rcu_scheduler_active;
 }
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT */
+static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT */
 
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 
@@ -164,10 +171,17 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
 {
 	return preempt_count() != 0 || !rcu_scheduler_active;
 }
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT */
+static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT */
 
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-04 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-04  1:50 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] rcu: fix !PREEMPT, __mpol_dup(), and ftrace_perf_buf_prepare() RCU lockdep splats Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-04  1:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Make rcu_read_lock_sched_held() handle !PREEMPT Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-04 16:32   ` tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-03-04  1:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: suppress __mpol_dup() false positive from RCU lockdep Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-04 16:32   ` [tip:core/urgent] rcu: Suppress " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-04  1:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu, ftrace: fix RCU lockdep splat in ftrace_perf_buf_prepare() Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-04  3:55   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 16:33   ` [tip:core/urgent] rcu, ftrace: Fix " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-e6033e3b307fcfae08408e0673266db38392bda4@git.kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox