linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Ingo Molnar <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, atodorov@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
	gong.chen@linux.intel.com, jwboyer@fedoraproject.org,
	qmewlo@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 02:57:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-ea431643d6c38728195e2c456801c3ef66bb9991@git.kernel.org> (raw)

Commit-ID:  ea431643d6c38728195e2c456801c3ef66bb9991
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/ea431643d6c38728195e2c456801c3ef66bb9991
Author:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:25:53 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:28:42 +0200

x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs

The following commit:

  27f6c573e0f7 ("x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI storms")

Added two preemption bugs:

 - machine_check_poll() does a get_cpu_var() without a matching
   put_cpu_var(), which causes preemption imbalance and crashes upon
   bootup.

 - it does percpu ops without disabling preemption. Preemption is not
   disabled due to the mistaken use of a raw spinlock.

To fix these bugs fix the imbalance and change
cmci_discover_lock to a regular spinlock.

Reported-by: Owen Kibel <qmewlo@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Todorov <atodorov@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-jtjptvgigpfkpvtQxpEk1at2@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c       |    4 +---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c |   18 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c       |  4 +---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index eeee23f..68317c8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -598,7 +598,6 @@ void machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t *b)
 {
 	struct mce m;
 	int i;
-	unsigned long *v;
 
 	this_cpu_inc(mce_poll_count);
 
@@ -618,8 +617,7 @@ void machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t *b)
 		if (!(m.status & MCI_STATUS_VAL))
 			continue;
 
-		v = &get_cpu_var(mce_polled_error);
-		set_bit(0, v);
+		this_cpu_write(mce_polled_error, 1);
 		/*
 		 * Uncorrected or signalled events are handled by the exception
 		 * handler when it is enabled, so don't process those here.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
index 3bdb95a..9a316b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(mce_banks_t, mce_banks_owned);
  * cmci_discover_lock protects against parallel discovery attempts
  * which could race against each other.
  */
-static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(cmci_discover_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cmci_discover_lock);
 
 #define CMCI_THRESHOLD		1
 #define CMCI_POLL_INTERVAL	(30 * HZ)
@@ -144,14 +144,14 @@ static void cmci_storm_disable_banks(void)
 	int bank;
 	u64 val;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
 	owned = __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned);
 	for_each_set_bit(bank, owned, MAX_NR_BANKS) {
 		rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
 		val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
 		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
 	}
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static bool cmci_storm_detect(void)
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void cmci_discover(int banks)
 	int i;
 	int bios_wrong_thresh = 0;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
 	for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
 		u64 val;
 		int bios_zero_thresh = 0;
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void cmci_discover(int banks)
 			WARN_ON(!test_bit(i, __get_cpu_var(mce_poll_banks)));
 		}
 	}
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
 	if (mca_cfg.bios_cmci_threshold && bios_wrong_thresh) {
 		pr_info_once(
 			"bios_cmci_threshold: Some banks do not have valid thresholds set\n");
@@ -316,10 +316,10 @@ void cmci_clear(void)
 
 	if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
 		return;
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
 	for (i = 0; i < banks; i++)
 		__cmci_disable_bank(i);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void cmci_rediscover_work_func(void *arg)
@@ -360,9 +360,9 @@ void cmci_disable_bank(int bank)
 	if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
 		return;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
 	__cmci_disable_bank(bank);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void intel_init_cmci(void)

             reply	other threads:[~2014-04-17  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-17  9:57 tip-bot for Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-04-17 10:09 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-17 10:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-17 14:03     ` Luck, Tony
2014-04-17 15:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-17 16:54         ` Josh Boyer
2014-04-17 19:23           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-17 19:25             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-17 19:42               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-17 20:58                 ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found]                   ` <CAK7FoDt6tnknX7cioe7=2svVksyAyLUtoZX_oprzJNxoHZEpdw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-17 21:30                     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-17 22:20                       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-18  8:07                         ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-18  9:22                           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-25  8:47                           ` Chen, Gong
2014-04-25 13:15                             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-ea431643d6c38728195e2c456801c3ef66bb9991@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=atodorov@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qmewlo@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).