public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86,nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit
@ 2012-06-06 14:05 Don Zickus
  2012-06-06 21:22 ` Witold Baryluk
  2012-06-08 14:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/nmi: " tip-bot for Don Zickus
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Don Zickus @ 2012-06-06 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: LKML, baryluk, Don Zickus, Jan Beulich

It was reported that compiling for 32-bit caused a bunch of section
mismatch warnings:

 VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
  LD      arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
  LD      arch/x86/built-in.o
WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.data+0x5af0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable
test_nmi_ipi_callback_na.10451 to the function .init.text:test_nmi_ipi_callback()
The variable test_nmi_ipi_callback_na.10451 references
the function __init test_nmi_ipi_callback()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console

WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.data+0x5b04): Section mismatch in reference from the variable
nmi_unk_cb_na.10399 to the function .init.text:nmi_unk_cb()
The variable nmi_unk_cb_na.10399 references
the function __init nmi_unk_cb()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console

Both of these are attributed to the internal representation of the nmiaction
struct created during register_nmi_handler.  The reason for this is that those
structs are not defined in the init section whereas the rest of the code in
nmi_selftest.c is.

To resolve this, I created a new #define, register_nmi_handler_initonly, that
tags the struct as __initdata to resolve the mismatch.  This #define should
only be used in rare situations where the register/unregister is called during
init of the kernel.

Big thanks to Jan Beulich for decoding this for me as I didn't have a clue
what was going on.

Reported-by: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h     |   14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
index 0e3793b..dc580c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
@@ -54,6 +54,20 @@ struct nmiaction {
 	__register_nmi_handler((t), &fn##_na);	\
 })
 
+/*
+ * For special handlers that register/unregister in the
+ * init section only.  This should be considered rare.
+ */
+#define register_nmi_handler_initonly(t, fn, fg, n)		\
+({							\
+	static struct nmiaction fn##_na __initdata = {		\
+		.handler = (fn),			\
+		.name = (n),				\
+		.flags = (fg),				\
+	};						\
+	__register_nmi_handler((t), &fn##_na);	\
+})
+
 int __register_nmi_handler(unsigned int, struct nmiaction *);
 
 void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int, const char *);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
index e31bf8d..149b8d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int __init nmi_unk_cb(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
 static void __init init_nmi_testsuite(void)
 {
 	/* trap all the unknown NMIs we may generate */
-	register_nmi_handler(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk");
+	register_nmi_handler_initonly(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk");
 }
 
 static void __init cleanup_nmi_testsuite(void)
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void __init test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout;
 
-	if (register_nmi_handler(NMI_LOCAL, test_nmi_ipi_callback,
+	if (register_nmi_handler_initonly(NMI_LOCAL, test_nmi_ipi_callback,
 				 NMI_FLAG_FIRST, "nmi_selftest")) {
 		nmi_fail = FAILURE;
 		return;
-- 
1.7.7.6


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86,nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit
  2012-06-06 14:05 [PATCH] x86,nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit Don Zickus
@ 2012-06-06 21:22 ` Witold Baryluk
  2012-06-08 14:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/nmi: " tip-bot for Don Zickus
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Witold Baryluk @ 2012-06-06 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Don Zickus; +Cc: x86, LKML, Jan Beulich

On 06-06 10:05, Don Zickus wrote:
> It was reported that compiling for 32-bit caused a bunch of section
> mismatch warnings:
> 
>  VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
>   LD      arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
>   LD      arch/x86/built-in.o
> WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.data+0x5af0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable
> test_nmi_ipi_callback_na.10451 to the function .init.text:test_nmi_ipi_callback()
> The variable test_nmi_ipi_callback_na.10451 references
> the function __init test_nmi_ipi_callback()
> If the reference is valid then annotate the
> variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
> *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console
> 
> WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.data+0x5b04): Section mismatch in reference from the variable
> nmi_unk_cb_na.10399 to the function .init.text:nmi_unk_cb()
> The variable nmi_unk_cb_na.10399 references
> the function __init nmi_unk_cb()
> If the reference is valid then annotate the
> variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
> *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console
> 
> Both of these are attributed to the internal representation of the nmiaction
> struct created during register_nmi_handler.  The reason for this is that those
> structs are not defined in the init section whereas the rest of the code in
> nmi_selftest.c is.
> 
> To resolve this, I created a new #define, register_nmi_handler_initonly, that
> tags the struct as __initdata to resolve the mismatch.  This #define should
> only be used in rare situations where the register/unregister is called during
> init of the kernel.
> 
> Big thanks to Jan Beulich for decoding this for me as I didn't have a clue
> what was going on.
> 
> Reported-by: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h     |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
> index 0e3793b..dc580c4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,20 @@ struct nmiaction {
>  	__register_nmi_handler((t), &fn##_na);	\
>  })
>  
> +/*
> + * For special handlers that register/unregister in the
> + * init section only.  This should be considered rare.
> + */
> +#define register_nmi_handler_initonly(t, fn, fg, n)		\
> +({							\
> +	static struct nmiaction fn##_na __initdata = {		\
> +		.handler = (fn),			\
> +		.name = (n),				\
> +		.flags = (fg),				\
> +	};						\
> +	__register_nmi_handler((t), &fn##_na);	\
> +})
> +
>  int __register_nmi_handler(unsigned int, struct nmiaction *);
>  
>  void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int, const char *);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
> index e31bf8d..149b8d9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int __init nmi_unk_cb(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  static void __init init_nmi_testsuite(void)
>  {
>  	/* trap all the unknown NMIs we may generate */
> -	register_nmi_handler(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk");
> +	register_nmi_handler_initonly(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk");
>  }
>  
>  static void __init cleanup_nmi_testsuite(void)
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void __init test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
>  {
>  	unsigned long timeout;
>  
> -	if (register_nmi_handler(NMI_LOCAL, test_nmi_ipi_callback,
> +	if (register_nmi_handler_initonly(NMI_LOCAL, test_nmi_ipi_callback,
>  				 NMI_FLAG_FIRST, "nmi_selftest")) {
>  		nmi_fail = FAILURE;
>  		return;
> -- 
> 1.7.7.6
> 

Works for me.

Tested-by: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>


-- 
Witold Baryluk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit
  2012-06-06 14:05 [PATCH] x86,nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit Don Zickus
  2012-06-06 21:22 ` Witold Baryluk
@ 2012-06-08 14:57 ` tip-bot for Don Zickus
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Don Zickus @ 2012-06-08 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, JBeulich, baryluk, tglx, dzickus

Commit-ID:  eeaaa96a3a2134a174100afd129bb0891d05f4b2
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/eeaaa96a3a2134a174100afd129bb0891d05f4b2
Author:     Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:05:42 -0400
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:19:27 +0200

x86/nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit

It was reported that compiling for 32-bit caused a bunch of
section mismatch warnings:

 VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
  LD      arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
  LD      arch/x86/built-in.o

 WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.data+0x5af0): Section mismatch in
 reference from the variable test_nmi_ipi_callback_na.10451 to
 the function .init.text:test_nmi_ipi_callback() [...]

 WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.data+0x5b04): Section mismatch in
 reference from the variable nmi_unk_cb_na.10399 to the function
 .init.text:nmi_unk_cb() The variable nmi_unk_cb_na.10399
 references the function __init nmi_unk_cb() [...]

Both of these are attributed to the internal representation of
the nmiaction struct created during register_nmi_handler.  The
reason for this is that those structs are not defined in the
init section whereas the rest of the code in nmi_selftest.c is.

To resolve this, I created a new #define,
register_nmi_handler_initonly, that tags the struct as
__initdata to resolve the mismatch.  This #define should only be
used in rare situations where the register/unregister is called
during init of the kernel.

Big thanks to Jan Beulich for decoding this for me as I didn't
have a clue what was going on.

Reported-by: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
Tested-by: Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1338991542-23000-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h     |   14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
index 0e3793b..dc580c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
@@ -54,6 +54,20 @@ struct nmiaction {
 	__register_nmi_handler((t), &fn##_na);	\
 })
 
+/*
+ * For special handlers that register/unregister in the
+ * init section only.  This should be considered rare.
+ */
+#define register_nmi_handler_initonly(t, fn, fg, n)		\
+({							\
+	static struct nmiaction fn##_na __initdata = {		\
+		.handler = (fn),			\
+		.name = (n),				\
+		.flags = (fg),				\
+	};						\
+	__register_nmi_handler((t), &fn##_na);	\
+})
+
 int __register_nmi_handler(unsigned int, struct nmiaction *);
 
 void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int, const char *);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
index e31bf8d..149b8d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int __init nmi_unk_cb(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
 static void __init init_nmi_testsuite(void)
 {
 	/* trap all the unknown NMIs we may generate */
-	register_nmi_handler(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk");
+	register_nmi_handler_initonly(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk");
 }
 
 static void __init cleanup_nmi_testsuite(void)
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void __init test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout;
 
-	if (register_nmi_handler(NMI_LOCAL, test_nmi_ipi_callback,
+	if (register_nmi_handler_initonly(NMI_LOCAL, test_nmi_ipi_callback,
 				 NMI_FLAG_FIRST, "nmi_selftest")) {
 		nmi_fail = FAILURE;
 		return;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-08 14:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-06 14:05 [PATCH] x86,nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit Don Zickus
2012-06-06 21:22 ` Witold Baryluk
2012-06-08 14:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/nmi: " tip-bot for Don Zickus

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox