From: tip-bot for Kan Liang <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, acme@redhat.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vincent.weaver@maine.edu,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
eranian@google.com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Fix large period handling on Broadwell CPUs
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:07:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-f605cfca8c39ffa2b98c06d2b9f30ba64f1e54e3@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519926894-3520-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Commit-ID: f605cfca8c39ffa2b98c06d2b9f30ba64f1e54e3
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/f605cfca8c39ffa2b98c06d2b9f30ba64f1e54e3
Author: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:54:54 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:22:05 +0100
perf/x86/intel: Fix large period handling on Broadwell CPUs
Large fixed period values could be truncated on Broadwell, for example:
perf record -e cycles -c 10000000000
Here the fixed period is 0x2540BE400, but the period which finally applied is
0x540BE400 - which is wrong.
The reason is that x86_pmu::limit_period() uses an u32 parameter, so the
high 32 bits of 'period' get truncated.
This bug was introduced in:
commit 294fe0f52a44 ("perf/x86/intel: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds")
It's safe to use u64 instead of u32:
- Although the 'left' is s64, the value of 'left' must be positive when
calling limit_period().
- bdw_limit_period() only modifies the lowest 6 bits, it doesn't touch
the higher 32 bits.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Fixes: 294fe0f52a44 ("perf/x86/intel: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519926894-3520-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
[ Rewrote unacceptably bad changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 56457cb73448..6b6c1717787d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3188,7 +3188,7 @@ glp_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
* Therefore the effective (average) period matches the requested period,
* despite coarser hardware granularity.
*/
-static unsigned bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, unsigned left)
+static u64 bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 left)
{
if ((event->hw.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) ==
X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01)) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 78f91ec1056e..6495ffd57e3e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirks;
int perfctr_second_write;
bool late_ack;
- unsigned (*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, unsigned l);
+ u64 (*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, u64 l);
/*
* sysfs attrs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-09 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-01 17:54 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix: Use u64 for limit_period kan.liang
2018-03-09 9:07 ` tip-bot for Kan Liang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-f605cfca8c39ffa2b98c06d2b9f30ba64f1e54e3@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).