linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Kan Liang <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, acme@redhat.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vincent.weaver@maine.edu,
	mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	eranian@google.com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Fix large period handling on Broadwell CPUs
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 01:07:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-f605cfca8c39ffa2b98c06d2b9f30ba64f1e54e3@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519926894-3520-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Commit-ID:  f605cfca8c39ffa2b98c06d2b9f30ba64f1e54e3
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/f605cfca8c39ffa2b98c06d2b9f30ba64f1e54e3
Author:     Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:54:54 -0500
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:22:05 +0100

perf/x86/intel: Fix large period handling on Broadwell CPUs

Large fixed period values could be truncated on Broadwell, for example:

  perf record -e cycles -c 10000000000

Here the fixed period is 0x2540BE400, but the period which finally applied is
0x540BE400 - which is wrong.

The reason is that x86_pmu::limit_period() uses an u32 parameter, so the
high 32 bits of 'period' get truncated.

This bug was introduced in:

  commit 294fe0f52a44 ("perf/x86/intel: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds")

It's safe to use u64 instead of u32:

 - Although the 'left' is s64, the value of 'left' must be positive when
   calling limit_period().

 - bdw_limit_period() only modifies the lowest 6 bits, it doesn't touch
   the higher 32 bits.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Fixes: 294fe0f52a44 ("perf/x86/intel: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519926894-3520-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
[ Rewrote unacceptably bad changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 2 +-
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 56457cb73448..6b6c1717787d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3188,7 +3188,7 @@ glp_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
  * Therefore the effective (average) period matches the requested period,
  * despite coarser hardware granularity.
  */
-static unsigned bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, unsigned left)
+static u64 bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 left)
 {
 	if ((event->hw.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) ==
 			X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01)) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 78f91ec1056e..6495ffd57e3e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirks;
 	int		perfctr_second_write;
 	bool		late_ack;
-	unsigned	(*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, unsigned l);
+	u64		(*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, u64 l);
 
 	/*
 	 * sysfs attrs

      reply	other threads:[~2018-03-09  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-01 17:54 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix: Use u64 for limit_period kan.liang
2018-03-09  9:07 ` tip-bot for Kan Liang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-f605cfca8c39ffa2b98c06d2b9f30ba64f1e54e3@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).