From: tip-bot for Byungchul Park <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
byungchul.park@lge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] workqueue: Remove now redundant lock acquisitions wrt. workqueue flushes
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 04:13:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-fd1a5b04dfb899f84ddeb8acdaea6b98283df1e5@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508921765-15396-9-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
Commit-ID: fd1a5b04dfb899f84ddeb8acdaea6b98283df1e5
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/fd1a5b04dfb899f84ddeb8acdaea6b98283df1e5
Author: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:56:04 +0900
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:19:03 +0200
workqueue: Remove now redundant lock acquisitions wrt. workqueue flushes
The workqueue code added manual lock acquisition annotations to catch
deadlocks.
After lockdepcrossrelease was introduced, some of those became redundant,
since wait_for_completion() already does the acquisition and tracking.
Remove the duplicate annotations.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: amir73il@gmail.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: david@fromorbit.com
Cc: hch@infradead.org
Cc: idryomov@gmail.com
Cc: johan@kernel.org
Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com
Cc: kernel-team@lge.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508921765-15396-9-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 4 ++--
kernel/workqueue.c | 19 +++----------------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 1c49431..c8a572c 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static inline unsigned int work_static(struct work_struct *work) { return 0; }
\
__init_work((_work), _onstack); \
(_work)->data = (atomic_long_t) WORK_DATA_INIT(); \
- lockdep_init_map(&(_work)->lockdep_map, #_work, &__key, 0); \
+ lockdep_init_map(&(_work)->lockdep_map, "(work_completion)"#_work, &__key, 0); \
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(_work)->entry); \
(_work)->func = (_func); \
} while (0)
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ __alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt, unsigned int flags, int max_active,
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
const char *__lock_name; \
\
- __lock_name = #fmt#args; \
+ __lock_name = "(wq_completion)"#fmt#args; \
\
__alloc_workqueue_key((fmt), (flags), (max_active), \
&__key, __lock_name, ##args); \
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 39831b2..160fdc6 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2497,15 +2497,8 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&barr->work, wq_barrier_func);
__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
- /*
- * Explicitly init the crosslock for wq_barrier::done, make its lock
- * key a subkey of the corresponding work. As a result we won't
- * build a dependency between wq_barrier::done and unrelated work.
- */
- lockdep_init_map_crosslock((struct lockdep_map *)&barr->done.map,
- "(complete)wq_barr::done",
- target->lockdep_map.key, 1);
- __init_completion(&barr->done);
+ init_completion_map(&barr->done, &target->lockdep_map);
+
barr->task = current;
/*
@@ -2611,16 +2604,13 @@ void flush_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
struct wq_flusher this_flusher = {
.list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(this_flusher.list),
.flush_color = -1,
- .done = COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(this_flusher.done),
+ .done = COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK_MAP(this_flusher.done, wq->lockdep_map),
};
int next_color;
if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
return;
- lock_map_acquire(&wq->lockdep_map);
- lock_map_release(&wq->lockdep_map);
-
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
/*
@@ -2883,9 +2873,6 @@ bool flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
return false;
- lock_map_acquire(&work->lockdep_map);
- lock_map_release(&work->lockdep_map);
-
if (start_flush_work(work, &barr)) {
wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-25 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-25 8:55 [PATCH v5 0/9] cross-release: Enhence performance and fix false positives Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 8:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] block: use DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK in submit_bio_wait Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 11:10 ` [tip:locking/core] block: Use DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK() in submit_bio_wait() tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-25 8:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] locking/lockdep: Provide empty lockdep_map structure for !CONFIG_LOCKDEP Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 11:11 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 8:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] completion: Change the prefix of lock name for completion variable Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 11:11 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep, sched/completions: Change the prefix of lock name for completion variables tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 8:56 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] locking/lockdep: Add a boot parameter allowing unwind in cross-release and disable it by default Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 11:11 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 8:56 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] locking/lockdep: Remove the BROKEN flag from CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE and CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 11:12 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 8:56 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] locking/lockdep: Introduce CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE_FULLSTACK Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 11:12 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Introduce CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE_FULLSTACK=y tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 8:56 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] completion: Add support for initializing completion with lockdep_map Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 11:12 ` [tip:locking/core] sched/completions: Add support for initializing completions " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 8:56 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] workqueue: Remove unnecessary acquisitions wrt workqueue flush Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 11:13 ` tip-bot for Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-10-25 8:56 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] block: Assign a lock_class per gendisk used for wait_for_completion() Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 10:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-25 18:20 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-26 5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-26 5:58 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-26 9:31 ` [tip:locking/core] block, locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-fd1a5b04dfb899f84ddeb8acdaea6b98283df1e5@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox