From: "tip-bot for Kirill A. Shutemov" <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, willy@linux.intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, aarcange@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm: Implement ASLR for hugetlb mappings
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:18:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-fd8526ad14c182605e42b64646344b95befd9f94@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131119131750.EA45CE0090@blue.fi.intel.com>
Commit-ID: fd8526ad14c182605e42b64646344b95befd9f94
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/fd8526ad14c182605e42b64646344b95befd9f94
Author: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:17:50 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:24:50 +0100
x86/mm: Implement ASLR for hugetlb mappings
Matthew noticed that hugetlb mappings don't participate in ASLR on x86-64:
% for i in `seq 3`; do
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/map_hugetlb | grep address
> done
Returned address is 0x2aaaaac00000
Returned address is 0x2aaaaac00000
Returned address is 0x2aaaaac00000
/proc/PID/maps entries for the mapping are always the same
(except inode number):
2aaaaac00000-2aaabac00000 rw-p 00000000 00:0c 8200 /anon_hugepage (deleted)
2aaaaac00000-2aaabac00000 rw-p 00000000 00:0c 256 /anon_hugepage (deleted)
2aaaaac00000-2aaabac00000 rw-p 00000000 00:0c 7180 /anon_hugepage (deleted)
The reason is the generic hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() function
which is used on x86-64. It doesn't support randomization and
use bottom-up unmapped area lookup, instead of usual top-down
on x86-64.
x86 has arch-specific hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(), but it's used
only on x86-32.
Let's use arch-specific hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() on x86-64
too. That adds ASLR and switches hugetlb mappings to use top-down
unmapped area lookup:
% for i in `seq 3`; do
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/map_hugetlb | grep address
> done
Returned address is 0x7f4f08a00000
Returned address is 0x7fdda4200000
Returned address is 0x7febe0000000
/proc/PID/maps entries:
7f4f08a00000-7f4f18a00000 rw-p 00000000 00:0c 1168 /anon_hugepage (deleted)
7fdda4200000-7fddb4200000 rw-p 00000000 00:0c 7092 /anon_hugepage (deleted)
7febe0000000-7febf0000000 rw-p 00000000 00:0c 7183 /anon_hugepage (deleted)
Unmapped area lookup policy for hugetlb mappings is consistent
with normal mappings now -- the only difference is alignment
requirements for huge pages.
libhugetlbfs test-suite didn't detect any regressions with the
patch applied (although it shows few failures on my machine
regardless the patch).
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131119131750.EA45CE0090@blue.fi.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/page.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h | 4 ----
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 9 +++------
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
index c878924..775873d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ extern bool __virt_addr_valid(unsigned long kaddr);
#include <asm-generic/getorder.h>
#define __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA 1
+#define HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_PAGE_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h
index 4d550d0..904f528 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h
@@ -5,10 +5,6 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
-#define HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA
-#endif
-
#define __phys_addr_nodebug(x) ((x) - PAGE_OFFSET)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL
extern unsigned long __phys_addr(unsigned long);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
index 9d980d8..8c9f647 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c
@@ -87,9 +87,7 @@ int pmd_huge_support(void)
}
#endif
-/* x86_64 also uses this file */
-
-#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA
+#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
static unsigned long hugetlb_get_unmapped_area_bottomup(struct file *file,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
@@ -99,7 +97,7 @@ static unsigned long hugetlb_get_unmapped_area_bottomup(struct file *file,
info.flags = 0;
info.length = len;
- info.low_limit = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
+ info.low_limit = current->mm->mmap_legacy_base;
info.high_limit = TASK_SIZE;
info.align_mask = PAGE_MASK & ~huge_page_mask(h);
info.align_offset = 0;
@@ -172,8 +170,7 @@ hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
return hugetlb_get_unmapped_area_topdown(file, addr, len,
pgoff, flags);
}
-
-#endif /*HAVE_ARCH_HUGETLB_UNMAPPED_AREA*/
+#endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
static __init int setup_hugepagesz(char *opt)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-19 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20131115221406.1692E1E418F@corp2gmr1-2.eem.corp.google.com>
2013-11-19 8:30 ` [patch 3/3] x86, mm: get ASLR work for hugetlb mappings Ingo Molnar
2013-11-19 13:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-11-19 13:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-19 19:18 ` tip-bot for Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-fd8526ad14c182605e42b64646344b95befd9f94@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).