From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Reintroduce support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:37:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ttitxhx@ub.hpns> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720085834.898025-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 10:58:26AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> v4:
> - Add two more cleanup patches based on Sashiko feedback, however I
> don't consider them as bug fixes. This is more cosmetics:
> - Use handle_fault_error() in do_secure_storage_access()
> - Use goto statement in do_secure_storage_access()
>
> v3:
> - Fix two more pre-existing bugs reported by Sashiko
> - Add Christian's Tested-by tag to four of the six patches
>
> v2:
> - Explicitely PAGE_ALIGN size in uv_alloc_stor_var() [Sashiko]
> - Document that lazy PTE update / TLB flushing is intended [Sashiko]
>
> v1:
> Support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS was recently removed [1] since it caused
> problems with the incomplete handling of secure storage access
> exceptions. It looked like fixing the exception handler would be a larger
> effort; therefore support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS was removed as a work
> around.
>
> Address the potential problems that exist with secure storage access
> exceptions and add support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS again.
>
> In particular address the following problems:
>
> - Reading the guest variable storage area via the /proc/kcore interface
> results in short reads. Address this by using a VM_SPARSE area for the
> guest variable storage area. VM_SPARSE areas will be handled like
> memory holes (zeros will be read).
>
> - Fix handling of secure storage access exceptions in vmalloc area.
>
> - Remove folio handling for secure storage access exceptions to avoid
> potential data corruption.
>
> [1] 37540b8c287f ("s390: Revert support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS")
>
> Heiko Carstens (8):
> KVM: s390: pv: Use VM_SPARSE area for guest variable storage area
> s390/mm: Add missing mm check to do_secure_storage_access()
> s390/mm: Use lock_mm_and_find_vma() in do_secure_storage_access()
> s390/mm: Fix handling of vmalloc area in do_secure_storage_access()
> s390/mm: Remove folio handling for kernel faults in do_secure_storage_access()
> s390/mm: Use handle_fault_error() in do_secure_storage_access()
> s390/mm: Use goto statement in do_secure_storage_access()
> s390: Add support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS (again)
>
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/s390/include/asm/asm-extable.h | 4 ++
> arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h | 2 +
> arch/s390/include/asm/word-at-a-time.h | 22 +++++++++
> arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 6 +--
> arch/s390/mm/extable.c | 18 +++++++
> arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 35 ++++++--------
> 8 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Applied, thank you!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 8:58 [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Reintroduce support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS Heiko Carstens
2026-07-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] KVM: s390: pv: Use VM_SPARSE area for guest variable storage area Heiko Carstens
2026-07-20 9:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-20 10:15 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-07-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] s390/mm: Add missing mm check to do_secure_storage_access() Heiko Carstens
2026-07-20 10:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] s390/mm: Use lock_mm_and_find_vma() in do_secure_storage_access() Heiko Carstens
2026-07-20 10:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] s390/mm: Fix handling of vmalloc area " Heiko Carstens
2026-07-20 10:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] s390/mm: Remove folio handling for kernel faults " Heiko Carstens
2026-07-20 10:53 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-24 8:17 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] s390/mm: Use handle_fault_error() " Heiko Carstens
2026-07-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] s390/mm: Use goto statement " Heiko Carstens
2026-07-20 10:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-20 8:58 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] s390: Add support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS (again) Heiko Carstens
2026-07-21 9:59 ` Sven Schnelle
2026-07-20 9:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Reintroduce support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-20 9:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-07-27 10:37 ` Vasily Gorbik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ttitxhx@ub.hpns \
--to=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox