From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754204AbYEaRTg (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2008 13:19:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751593AbYEaRT1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2008 13:19:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]:38262 "EHLO mx1.math.uh.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751352AbYEaRT0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2008 13:19:26 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1822 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 13:19:26 EDT To: Alan Cox Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: via agp patches References: <20080531003214.GA6208@suse.de> <20080531003354.GC6208@suse.de> <20080531132532.668f6520@core> From: Jason L Tibbitts III Date: 31 May 2008 11:48:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080531132532.668f6520@core> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "AC" == Alan Cox writes: AC> Do we think the above is GPL compatible, do VIA think so, do VIA AC> care to say in writing they consider it is if there are questions? It seems to me that's just an MIT variant, identical to what Fedora calls the "Modern Style with sublicense" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT which is GPL compatible according to the FSF at least (although the FSF prefers that it not be called "the MIT license" for various reasons). - J<