From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264078AbTKJT1G (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:27:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264080AbTKJT1F (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:27:05 -0500 Received: from ulysses.news.tiscali.de ([195.185.185.36]:32270 "EHLO ulysses.news.tiscali.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264078AbTKJT05 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:26:57 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: 127.0.0.1!nobody From: Peter Matthias Newsgroups: linux.kernel Subject: Re: kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:16:15 +0100 Organization: Tiscali Germany Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: p62.246.113.118.tisdip.tiscali.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: ulysses.news.tiscali.de 1068492044 53122 62.246.113.118 (10 Nov 2003 19:20:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@tiscali.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:20:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH schrieb: > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:21:59AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: >> The problem is that cdc_acm calls a "softirq-only" routine >> in a hardirq context. See this patch: >> >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106764585001038&w=2 >> >> It's not clear that'll make it into 2.6.0-final. > > I've not planned to submit it for 2.6.0 as it's a relativly big change, > and I don't have the hardware to test it out. Anyone have any other > thoughts about this? IMO it's a must be fixed issue for 2.6.0 and it works on my system. Peter