From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754475AbZBXA2m (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:28:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757993AbZBXAUy (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:20:54 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:42584 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756922AbZBXAUw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:20:52 -0500 Cc: Kernel Testers List , "Matthew A. Bockol" References: In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: Subject: [Bug #12763] Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:48:17 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763 Subject : Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1 Submitter : Matthew A. Bockol Date : 2009-02-21 5:42 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4