From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yx1-f45.google.com (mail-yx1-f45.google.com [74.125.224.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A74712FC890 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 14:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.224.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767797980; cv=none; b=SmXrgdEQjy+EoridVh3t0f4N8dDPR0j9wKllyOH/Boau+jqirV8jJVPRoo5q4e1edF5mqNHOVUmEHF1p3P4OJ8g6lSyfTQDZklU0LPHtWMlm5NdmPPP62MEBxps3I9it4pnVGwhRtt7uS8yXSsZqK1DkPkKWkRCRISK8npyX75c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767797980; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/g+VPdf5RLxM3FpCwylvaiin4nBnMP86FjrQ2QeZu2c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=R+kddu12XYVwyoDFCiONFHLKyJZ5USK7lLurJ1UlWOvXFL7im83uJMeGl37ajmNlRYAmQ9aFXQi7CvkQJvvnfI7+mI+c3Zih2D09xf3qeJ6MURmLZ/8EdPcYPxEQ5IGpyYX56tG2B6OBowSrWYDzROIfOTsLHCU2X1iEXdCcyUI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=YMYUCLYq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.224.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="YMYUCLYq" Received: by mail-yx1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 956f58d0204a3-64476c85854so2117297d50.0 for ; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 06:59:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1767797977; x=1768402777; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:references :in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ygEsBMOtQfOnd+ceAekCXMasHvVQy7UNaDcAc1PawvA=; b=YMYUCLYq2dJWMCKoC+oWjv27yM2iCKeBsMMNIcYPVJ9aPbwlMM8WtvDtWj38GIOR7M xIXoIb+anvUvL1HInj6BrdYuCF5TcEZ83PRLVED0/wPj8vrvYRE9dIWIUi+I5gXJ7wNJ AViT+KEm/wB9VJrs+ov9E65HzNnRdlQ+og0eR2x7lyu8sqQL3yBzaUrIHb1r616fPO7x oPDtFodb8sG1ZMTR1ERrrCuDDcGwr5h8NbNd2EFfakTSmajcIGGzWdIQ+e49NsF5kDel 9V8DXIIZVW1I+Dc2SGMPmO/uVJh8W8wGn+5gq8Rs8rMYPHfyt6KshxnKAgIs91C1d4d2 LJVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1767797977; x=1768402777; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:references :in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ygEsBMOtQfOnd+ceAekCXMasHvVQy7UNaDcAc1PawvA=; b=OZA7CzHvAFisFgk5PCIO6t39ycB4v1AzxJMKZN1bwtUgteR67QORqNHcVJEovNxYlI 9DA6W5V73m8AdLSALyIqyd7fqClVBqGgSzlPPN5SyvPxcQvydgMu7FO9fGL6sx5aCJOY z2thSDPBzS0jAOZIpIud7wRYODx4IoqDZPeHqDU2PDBvJnGZRMWSBxk5FHHcO8o/6Xj7 NmLbCnIIGo8xdORL6mK9aSxYlpLP3zPMGrEh1I9H3+KAHla/KnnMZnKEg7fVmxj4AnoJ Z8g8cepOYjBfjV0MFGSui0gz14rFYjU2Ofhj83bHOSBBJswQvGH2IsouQDwQ1gd9LXxw IneA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUjujSto8UdX3mHpAH6b03aJA4ky/bPTpW5qe/DimzcRSeqz4Yq5qVqibRJFQicCGUKkrSr6iuKzPoDUhY=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxsZ1qqOxHOWUAxAVmNrFDZC5igqc25UiNdQClOpjAgpCuc0r/B 91GMXokvR0RThLq12MTaTsGhssVMEx135i2Cl4OvZq6Dv1ULdjpeHvVp X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX7WjcRa0ZL8TCRM2N4T2cVI2dSYTJkn52ixLI+OFCdFdiLIzl6VByXRWDNV1/5 dXYI9mkZ+VrK8+MpKh0uAYoYx4cYJeeOlpRHbq85v7rNMtJHisRLzO1IOnMgEPdKrmib2oJzM7N MLv0l++2126uUzNY9rXmbCR3x3jUIAKATTQX1t0memMVTB704TYawzDc5jjIPqDE3iztsBoqJe1 YzEgibTkTLItwRMXj3zpneIjabSW6dQ/TNz+aEFuchXbad1TQBWi25CmMGBlmRgHYOb3zy4lc55 LHYvUrZJYs7snR+/ScNtbdyQUcFL6JmAMDUn57CUpVVcUZ39vOBWtW1P9xOfIrkyfieUoeB8Yyz OMk6AsQPBOL8stepoZ070xwCoHIwYPk+RqS/U+MY2Lu4C4Va/vEIAyzgJPmsMl0FUSWx4XtwKlA ggu3UfCe4hGD26BtHi+J2/uv6hnVN6RTmAVEfZK9o7g/IFwyaBKWqyuwTNmTI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGckZa869lQuPtJPN6tXowxLF91dFKwcfoBAPflAsajZxCtT4RbtUWJmXlz8CVoUJtC1vKmA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:315:b0:789:3166:25a7 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-790b5828b28mr57702757b3.46.1767797977574; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 06:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (250.4.48.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.48.4.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id 00721157ae682-790aa553750sm19318617b3.9.2026.01.07.06.59.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Jan 2026 06:59:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 09:59:36 -0500 From: Willem de Bruijn To: Xu Du , Jakub Kicinski Cc: Willem de Bruijn , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20260106145822.3cd9b317@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] selftest: Extend tun/virtio coverage for GSO over UDP tunnel Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xu Du wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 6:58=E2=80=AFAM Jakub Kicinski = wrote: > > > > On Tue, 06 Jan 2026 17:14:05 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > For instance, can the new netlink code be replaced by YNL, whether = in > > > C or called from a script? > > > > +1 looks like YNL is already used in net/ tests, and it supports > > the operations in question, so that's a much better direction. > > Please let us (YNL maintainers) know if there's anything missing > > or not working, IDK how much use the rtnetlink support in YNL is > > getting. > > > = > Thank you for the suggestion. I am looking into replacing the netlink > with YNL to reduce code. But after reviewing rt-link.rst, I found that > rt-link currently lacks support for VXLAN. Would more significant chang= es > to the patch be acceptable if I switch to Geneve to leverage YNL? These are only changes to the new code in your series. SGTM. I assume it is not a significant burden as the two are fairly similar. Is that correct? Eventually it may be nice to have VXLAN support in YNL akin to Geneve support. But sounds like a separate goal.