linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>,
	 willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: bacs@librecast.net,  davem@davemloft.net,  edumazet@google.com,
	 gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,  horms@kernel.org,  kuba@kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org,  pabeni@redhat.com,  shuah@kernel.org,
	 willemb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] selftests: net: add test for ipv6 fragmentation
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 10:48:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.e019291a1132@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902142502.27278-1-bacs@librecast.net>

Brett A C Sheffield wrote:
> Add selftest for the IPv6 fragmentation regression which affected
> several stable kernels.
> 
> Commit a18dfa9925b9 ("ipv6: save dontfrag in cork") was backported to
> stable without some prerequisite commits.  This caused a regression when
> sending IPv6 UDP packets by preventing fragmentation and instead
> returning -1 (EMSGSIZE).
> 
> Add selftest to check for this issue by attempting to send a packet
> larger than the interface MTU. The packet will be fragmented on a
> working kernel, with sendmsg(2) correctly returning the expected number
> of bytes sent.  When the regression is present, sendmsg returns -1 and
> sets errno to EMSGSIZE.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/aElivdUXqd1OqgMY@karahi.gladserv.com
> Signed-off-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> ---
> Thanks for the reviews Willem and Jakub.
> 
> On 2025-09-01 09:45, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> 
> > > +int main(void)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct in6_addr addr = {
> > > +           .s6_addr[15] = 0x01, /* ::1 */
> > > +   };
> > > +   struct sockaddr_in6 sa = {
> > > +           .sin6_family = AF_INET6,
> > > +           .sin6_addr = addr,
> > > +           .sin6_port = 9      /* port 9/udp (DISCARD) */
> >
> > htons
> 
> addr is already initialized in network byte order (BE) here.

My point was about port

> 
> Verified with:
> 
>         char ip6[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN];
>         inet_ntop(AF_INET6, &(sa.sin6_addr), ip6, INET6_ADDRSTRLEN);
>         printf("The address is %s\n", ip6);
> 
> which prints "The address is ::1"
> 
> All other suggestions adopted in v5.
> 
> 
> v5 changes:
>  - disable_dad: delete - not needed for lo
>  - main: simplify failure paths
>  - main: char -> static char buf
>  - setup: remove pointless return value
>  - setup: remove unused variable fd
>  - setup: merge with interface_up() to simplify
>  - setup: check all system call return values
>  - remove no longer used headers
> 
> v4 changes:
>  - fix "else should follow close brace" (checkpatch ERROR)
> 
> v3 changes:
>  - add usleep instead of busy polling on sendmsg
>  - simplify error handling by using error() and leaving cleanup to O/S
>  - use loopback interface - don't bother creating TAP
>  - send to localhost (::1)
> 
> v2 changes:
>  - remove superfluous namespace calls - unshare(2) suffices
>  - remove usleep(). Don't wait for the interface to be ready, just send, and
>    handle the (less likely) error case by retrying.
>  - set destination address only once
>  - document our use of the IPv6 link-local source address
>  - send to port 9 (DISCARD) instead of 4242 (DONT PANIC)
>  - ensure sockets are closed on failure paths
>  - use KSFT exit codes for clarity
> 
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250901123757.13112-1-bacs@librecast.net
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250901112248.5218-1-bacs@librecast.net
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250831102908.14655-1-bacs@librecast.net
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250825092548.4436-3-bacs@librecast.net
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore        |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile          |   1 +
>  .../selftests/net/ipv6_fragmentation.c        | 115 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/ipv6_fragmentation.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore
> index 47c293c2962f..3d4b4a53dfda 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ ip_local_port_range
>  ipsec
>  ipv6_flowlabel
>  ipv6_flowlabel_mgr
> +ipv6_fragmentation
>  log.txt
>  msg_oob
>  msg_zerocopy
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> index eef0b8f8a7b0..276e0481d996 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += tfo
>  TEST_PROGS += tfo_passive.sh
>  TEST_PROGS += broadcast_pmtu.sh
>  TEST_PROGS += ipv6_force_forwarding.sh
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS += ipv6_fragmentation
>  TEST_PROGS += route_hint.sh
>  
>  # YNL files, must be before "include ..lib.mk"
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipv6_fragmentation.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipv6_fragmentation.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b76ce7b713fc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipv6_fragmentation.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Author: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
> + *
> + * Kernel selftest for the IPv6 fragmentation regression which affected stable
> + * kernels:
> + *
> + *   https://lore.kernel.org/stable/aElivdUXqd1OqgMY@karahi.gladserv.com
> + *
> + * Commit: a18dfa9925b9 ("ipv6: save dontfrag in cork") was backported to stable
> + * without some prerequisite commits.
> + *
> + * This caused a regression when sending IPv6 UDP packets by preventing
> + * fragmentation and instead returning -1 (EMSGSIZE).
> + *
> + * This selftest demonstrates the issue by sending an IPv6 UDP packet to
> + * localhost (::1) on the loopback interface from the autoconfigured link-local
> + * address.
> + *
> + * sendmsg(2) returns bytes sent correctly on a working kernel, and returns -1
> + * (EMSGSIZE) when the regression is present.
> + *
> + * The regression was not present in the mainline kernel, but add this test to
> + * catch similar breakage in future.
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +
> +#include <error.h>
> +#include <net/if.h>
> +#include <netinet/in.h>
> +#include <sched.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +#include <sys/socket.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include "../kselftest.h"
> +
> +#define MTU 1500
> +#define LARGER_THAN_MTU 8192
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> +	struct ifreq ifr = {
> +		.ifr_name = "lo"
> +	};
> +	int ctl;
> +
> +	/* we need to set MTU, so do this in a namespace to play nicely */
> +	if (unshare(CLONE_NEWNET) == -1)
> +		error(KSFT_FAIL, errno, "unshare");
> +
> +	ctl = socket(AF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> +	if (ctl == -1)
> +		error(KSFT_FAIL, errno, "socket");
> +
> +	/* ensure MTU is smaller than what we plan to send */
> +	ifr.ifr_mtu = MTU;
> +	if (ioctl(ctl, SIOCSIFMTU, &ifr) == -1)
> +		error(KSFT_FAIL, errno, "ioctl: set MTU");
> +
> +	/* bring up interface */
> +	if (ioctl(ctl, SIOCGIFFLAGS, &ifr) == -1)
> +		error(KSFT_FAIL, errno, "ioctl SIOCGIFFLAGS");
> +	ifr.ifr_flags = ifr.ifr_flags | IFF_UP;
> +	if (ioctl(ctl, SIOCSIFFLAGS, &ifr) == -1)
> +		error(KSFT_FAIL, errno, "ioctl: bring interface up");
> +
> +	if (close(ctl) == -1)
> +		error(KSFT_FAIL, errno, "close");
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> +	struct in6_addr addr = {
> +		.s6_addr[15] = 0x01, /* ::1 */
> +	};
> +	struct sockaddr_in6 sa = {
> +		.sin6_family = AF_INET6,
> +		.sin6_addr = addr,
> +		.sin6_port = 9      /* port 9/udp (DISCARD) */
> +	};
> +	static char buf[LARGER_THAN_MTU] = {0};
> +	struct iovec iov = { .iov_base = buf, .iov_len = sizeof(buf) };
> +	struct msghdr msg = {
> +		.msg_iov = &iov,
> +		.msg_iovlen = 1,
> +		.msg_name = (struct sockaddr *)&sa,
> +		.msg_namelen = sizeof(sa),
> +	};
> +	ssize_t rc;
> +	int err = KSFT_FAIL;
> +	int s;
> +
> +	printf("Testing IPv6 fragmentation\n");
> +	setup();
> +	s = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> +send_again:
> +	rc = sendmsg(s, &msg, 0);
> +	if (rc == -1) {
> +		/* if interface wasn't ready, try again */
> +		if (errno == EADDRNOTAVAIL) {
> +			usleep(1000);
> +			goto send_again;
> +		}
> +		error(KSFT_FAIL, errno, "sendmsg");
> +	} else if (rc != LARGER_THAN_MTU) {
> +		error(KSFT_FAIL, errno, "sendmsg returned %zi, expected %i",
> +				rc, LARGER_THAN_MTU);
> +	}
> +	printf("[PASS] sendmsg() returned %zi\n", rc);
> +	err = KSFT_PASS;

err is no longer needed, just return KSFT_PASS below

> +	close(s);

reminder to check return value of all library and system calls
> +	return err;
> +}
> 
> base-commit: cd8a4cfa6bb43a441901e82f5c222dddc75a18a3
> -- 
> 2.49.1
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-02 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-02 14:23 [PATCH net-next v5] selftests: net: add test for ipv6 fragmentation Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-02 14:48 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.e019291a1132@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bacs@librecast.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).