From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: David Decotigny <ddecotig@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: endianness issues
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:33:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wrfj4mlvoo24.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433724182-657-1-git-send-email-ddecotig@gmail.com> (David Decotigny's message of "Sun, 7 Jun 2015 17:43:00 -0700")
David Decotigny <ddecotig@gmail.com> writes:
> The code shows a couple inconsistencies (described in commit
> descriptions) which would not be an issue on little-endian cpus, but
> could cause breakage on non-LE cpus. Note: I could not test on real
> hardware, these patches created based on sparse reports.
>
> Hostory:
> - resending the same patches to correct recipients, only changed
> commit descriptions (credits to Dan Carpenter)
>
> ############################################
> # Patch Set Summary:
>
> David Decotigny (2):
> staging: rtl8723au: core: avoid bitwise arithmetic with forced
> endianness
> staging: rtl8723au: core: remove redundant endianness conversion
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Looks fine to me, however if you fiddle with this same value twice,
wouldn't it be better to do it in one patch?
Cheers,
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-25 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 0:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: endianness issues David Decotigny
2015-06-08 0:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: avoid bitwise arithmetic with forced endianness David Decotigny
2015-06-08 0:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: remove redundant endianness conversion David Decotigny
2015-06-08 8:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: endianness issues Dan Carpenter
2015-06-25 14:33 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-07 0:33 David Decotigny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wrfj4mlvoo24.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=ddecotig@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).