From: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>
To: Peng Wang <rocking@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bristot@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Reorder throttle_cfs_rq() path
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:27:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xm26imab3ahw.fsf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f11dd2e3ab35cc538e2eb57bf0c99b6eaffce127.1604973978.git.rocking@linux.alibaba.com> (Peng Wang's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:11:59 +0800")
Peng Wang <rocking@linux.alibaba.com> writes:
> As commit 39f23ce07b93 ("sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for
> leaf_cfs_rq list") does in unthrottle_cfs_rq(), throttle_cfs_rq()
> can also use the same pattern as dequeue_task_fair().
>
> There is no functional changes.
It's generally a bit more hassle and less clear, but the parallel to
dequeue_task_fair probably makes up for it.
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Wang <rocking@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 290f9e3..27a69af 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4779,25 +4779,37 @@ static bool throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> struct cfs_rq *qcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> /* throttled entity or throttle-on-deactivate */
> if (!se->on_rq)
> - break;
> + goto done;
>
> - if (dequeue) {
> - dequeue_entity(qcfs_rq, se, DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
> - } else {
> - update_load_avg(qcfs_rq, se, 0);
> - se_update_runnable(se);
> - }
> + dequeue_entity(qcfs_rq, se, DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
>
> qcfs_rq->h_nr_running -= task_delta;
> qcfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running -= idle_task_delta;
>
> - if (qcfs_rq->load.weight)
> - dequeue = 0;
> + if (qcfs_rq->load.weight) {
> + /* Avoid re-evaluating load for this entity: */
> + se = parent_entity(se);
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> - if (!se)
> - sub_nr_running(rq, task_delta);
> + for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> + struct cfs_rq *qcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> + /* throttled entity or throttle-on-deactivate */
> + if (!se->on_rq)
> + goto done;
> +
> + update_load_avg(qcfs_rq, se, 0);
> + se_update_runnable(se);
>
> + qcfs_rq->h_nr_running -= task_delta;
> + qcfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running -= idle_task_delta;
> + }
> +
> + /* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/
> + sub_nr_running(rq, task_delta);
> +
> +done:
> /*
> * Note: distribution will already see us throttled via the
> * throttled-list. rq->lock protects completion.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-11 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 2:11 [PATCH] sched/fair: Reorder throttle_cfs_rq() path Peng Wang
2020-11-11 20:27 ` Benjamin Segall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xm26imab3ahw.fsf@google.com \
--to=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rocking@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox