public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Sched/fair: Block nohz tick_stop when cfs bandwidth in use
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:42:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xm26jzvn8ds7.fsf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230627191201.344110-1-pauld@redhat.com> (Phil Auld's message of "Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:12:01 -0400")

Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> writes:

> CFS bandwidth limits and NOHZ full don't play well together.  Tasks
> can easily run well past their quotas before a remote tick does
> accounting.  This leads to long, multi-period stalls before such
> tasks can run again. Currentlyi, when presented with these conflicting
> requirements the scheduler is favoring nohz_full and letting the tick
> be stopped. However, nohz tick stopping is already best-effort, there
> are a number of conditions that can prevent it, whereas cfs runtime
> bandwidth is expected to be enforced.
>
> Make the scheduler favor bandwidth over stopping the tick by setting
> TICK_DEP_BIT_SCHED when the only running task is a cfs task with
> runtime limit enabled.
>
> Add sched_feat HZ_BW (off by default) to control this behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> ---
>
> v2:  Ben pointed out that the bit could get cleared in the dequeue path
> if we migrate a newly enqueued task without preempting curr. Added a 
> check for that edge case to sched_can_stop_tick. Removed the call to 
> sched_can_stop_tick from sched_fair_update_stop_tick since it was 
> redundant.
>
>  kernel/sched/core.c     | 12 +++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/fair.c     | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/features.h |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index a68d1276bab0..646f60bfc7e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1194,6 +1194,8 @@ static void nohz_csd_func(void *info)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> +extern bool sched_cfs_bandwidth_active(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
> +
>  bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
>  {
>  	int fifo_nr_running;
> @@ -1229,6 +1231,16 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
>  	if (rq->nr_running > 1)
>  		return false;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If there is one task and it has CFS runtime bandwidth constraints
> +	 * and it's on the cpu now we don't want to stop the tick.
> +	 */
> +	if (sched_feat(HZ_BW) && rq->nr_running == 1 && rq->curr
> +	    && rq->curr->sched_class == &fair_sched_class && task_on_rq_queued(rq->curr)) {
> +		if (sched_cfs_bandwidth_active(task_cfs_rq(rq->curr)))

Actually, something I should have noticed earlier is that this should
probably be hierarchical, right? You need to check every ancestor
cfs_rq, not just the immediate parent. And at that point it probably
makes sense to have sched_cfs_bandwidth_active take a task_struct.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-28 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-27 19:12 [PATCH v2] Sched/fair: Block nohz tick_stop when cfs bandwidth in use Phil Auld
2023-06-27 21:19 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-28 21:42 ` Benjamin Segall [this message]
2023-06-29  0:53   ` Phil Auld
2023-06-29 17:55     ` Benjamin Segall
2023-06-29 19:06       ` Phil Auld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xm26jzvn8ds7.fsf@google.com \
    --to=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox