From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] GPIO bulk changes for kernel v4.6
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:37:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr3f7rbck.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwbRVG-5AW+NnMOFZ_hU5i+i7f3FxgEt9Qm7B6pEd7x0g@mail.gmail.com> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:47:02 -0700")
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> It's literally just the fact that "git merge" does it with no extra
> flags or checks. I'd like people to have to be aware of what they are
> doing when they merge two different projects, not do it by mistake.
>
> So making it conditional on a flag like "--no-common-root" is what I'd look for.
I think I said essentially the same thing in a separate message; I
am not sure "--no-common-root" is a good name, but I think it is
better to be more explicit than tying this to a strategy.
> I don't think the original "resolve" did it, for example. You can't do
> a three-way merge without a base.
Yes, and that continues to this day:
# Give up if we are given two or more remotes -- not handling octopus.
case "$remotes" in
?*' '?*)
exit 2 ;;
esac
# Give up if this is a baseless merge.
if test '' = "$bases"
then
exit 2
fi
This is a tangent but I wonder if we should say why we refuse to
the standard error before calling these two "exit"s.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-17 8:59 [GIT PULL] GPIO bulk changes for kernel v4.6 Linus Walleij
2016-03-18 6:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-18 6:07 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-18 7:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-18 14:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-03-18 15:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-03-18 15:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-18 16:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-03-18 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-18 17:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-03-18 9:01 ` Linus Walleij
2016-03-18 9:39 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-18 15:56 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqr3f7rbck.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox