From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
To: "Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com>
Cc: henning@makholm.net, bug-make@gnu.org,
linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sailer@ife.ee.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: make-3.79.1 bug breaks linux-2.5.24/drivers/net/hamradio/soundmodem
Date: 24 Jun 2002 14:13:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yahn0tklvs9.fsf@pc-043.diku.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: "Adam J. Richter"'s message of "Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:56:23 -0700"
Scripsit "Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com>
> >I'm not sure this is really a bug either. It is a Good Thing that make
> >tries to normalize the names of targets and dependencies internally,
> >lest the build may be incomplete or redundant if make does not realize
> >that foo.bar and ./foo.bar is the same file. It is quite reasonable
> >for $< to unfold to the *canonical* name of the file in question, I
> >think.
> That just makes the behavior of make less predictable.
> Whatever make does with the file names internally is its own business.
> Rewriting the file names passed to commands unnecessarily is
> potentially a big problem.
It is not rewriting file names. It is just substituting the name of
the dependency for the $< variable, just as documented.
> >If one absolutely wants the command to use the exact form of the
> >dependency that's used in the dependency list, it's easy to simply
> >reproduce that form, replacing the % by $*
> Sorry, I do not understand what you mean.
It wasn't right anyway. I remembered the semantics of $* when the file
name contains slashes wrong.
--
Henning Makholm "They are trying to prove a hypothesis,
they are down here gathering data every season,
they're publishing results in peer-reviewed journals.
They're wrong, I think, but they are still scientists."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-24 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-22 21:56 make-3.79.1 bug breaks linux-2.5.24/drivers/net/hamradio/soundmodem Adam J. Richter
2002-06-24 12:13 ` Henning Makholm [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-22 6:57 Adam J. Richter
2002-06-22 13:51 ` Henning Makholm
2002-06-22 20:23 ` Riley Williams
2002-06-22 21:24 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-06-24 12:00 ` Henning Makholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yahn0tklvs9.fsf@pc-043.diku.dk \
--to=henning@makholm.net \
--cc=adam@yggdrasil.com \
--cc=bug-make@gnu.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sailer@ife.ee.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox