From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263971AbUGRNMZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:12:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264012AbUGRNMZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:12:25 -0400 Received: from jaguar.mkp.net ([192.139.46.146]:8368 "EHLO jaguar.mkp.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263971AbUGRNMY (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:12:24 -0400 To: Jesse Barnes Cc: linux-kernel , Nick Piggin , John Hawkes , Martin Hicks , Shai Fultheim Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce inter-node balancing frequency References: <200407151829.20069.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> From: Jes Sorensen Date: 18 Jul 2004 09:12:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200407151829.20069.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Jesse" == Jesse Barnes writes: Jesse> Nick, we've had this patch floating around for awhile now and Jesse> I'm wondering what you think. It's needed to boot systems with Jesse> lots (e.g. 256) nodes, but could probably be done another way. Jesse> Do you think we should create a scheduler domain for every 64 Jesse> nodes or something? Any other NUMA folks have thoughts about Jesse> these values? vSMP could use something like this as well. I think Martin Hicks already did an arch-aware patch for setting these things. Jes